header-logo header-logo

01 March 2023
Issue: 8015 / Categories: Legal News , Constitutional law , EU , Brexit
printer mail-detail

All change in Northern Ireland?

Lawyers have been combing through the fine detail of the Windsor Framework, an agreement in principle on amending the Northern Ireland Protocol.

The government has scrapped the controversial Northern Ireland Protocol Bill as there is now ‘no legal justification’ for it. The EU will therefore drop the legal actions it launched against the UK over the Bill.

The framework, announced by Prime Minister Rishi Sunak and president of the European Commission Ursula von der Leyen this week, restricts the application of EU rules to the ‘minimum necessary’ so that less than 3% will be applicable. The oversight of the European Court of Justice is retained for matters of EU law only.

UK VAT and excise rules will now apply for alcoholic drinks for immediate consumption and immovable goods, whereas EU VAT rules could be applied under the Northern Ireland Protocol. However, EU VAT will still apply to other items.

A ‘Stormont brake’ is introduced, under which the Northern Ireland Assembly can oppose new EU goods rules that would have ‘significant and lasting effects’ on the people of Northern Ireland. In order to trigger the brake, the support of 30 members from at least two parties is required.

Bureaucracy on trade will be reduced through the use of a green lane and red lane, the former being used to fast-track goods intended to stay in Northern Ireland by removing customs checks and certifications. With a supermarket truck having to provide 500 certificates under the Northern Ireland Protocol, it can now simply make a declaration that the goods will stay in Northern Ireland. The red lane will be used for goods intended to enter the EU.

The same medicines with the same labels will be available across the UK, without the barcode scanning requirements of the Protocol. Similarly, the framework ends the restrictions on movement of seed potatoes, oak trees and other plants between Northern Ireland and the rest of the UK.

Sunak said the agreement was ‘written in the language of laws and treaties. But really, it’s about much more than that. It’s about stability in Northern Ireland. It’s about real people and real businesses.’

Issue: 8015 / Categories: Legal News , Constitutional law , EU , Brexit
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Projects and rail practices strengthened by director hire in London

DWF—Stephen Hickling

DWF—Stephen Hickling

Real estate team in Birmingham welcomes back returning partner

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Firm invests in national growth with 44 appointments across five offices

NEWS
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
Employment law is shifting at the margins. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ this week, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School examines a Court of Appeal ruling confirming that volunteers are not a special legal species and may qualify as ‘workers’
Refusing ADR is risky—but not always fatal. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed and Sanjay Dave Singh of the University of Leicester analyse Assensus Ltd v Wirsol Energy Ltd: despite repeated invitations to mediate, the defendant stood firm, made a £100,000 Part 36 offer and was ultimately ‘wholly vindicated’ at trial
back-to-top-scroll