header-logo header-logo

01 March 2023
Issue: 8015 / Categories: Legal News , Constitutional law , EU , Brexit
printer mail-detail

All change in Northern Ireland?

Lawyers have been combing through the fine detail of the Windsor Framework, an agreement in principle on amending the Northern Ireland Protocol.

The government has scrapped the controversial Northern Ireland Protocol Bill as there is now ‘no legal justification’ for it. The EU will therefore drop the legal actions it launched against the UK over the Bill.

The framework, announced by Prime Minister Rishi Sunak and president of the European Commission Ursula von der Leyen this week, restricts the application of EU rules to the ‘minimum necessary’ so that less than 3% will be applicable. The oversight of the European Court of Justice is retained for matters of EU law only.

UK VAT and excise rules will now apply for alcoholic drinks for immediate consumption and immovable goods, whereas EU VAT rules could be applied under the Northern Ireland Protocol. However, EU VAT will still apply to other items.

A ‘Stormont brake’ is introduced, under which the Northern Ireland Assembly can oppose new EU goods rules that would have ‘significant and lasting effects’ on the people of Northern Ireland. In order to trigger the brake, the support of 30 members from at least two parties is required.

Bureaucracy on trade will be reduced through the use of a green lane and red lane, the former being used to fast-track goods intended to stay in Northern Ireland by removing customs checks and certifications. With a supermarket truck having to provide 500 certificates under the Northern Ireland Protocol, it can now simply make a declaration that the goods will stay in Northern Ireland. The red lane will be used for goods intended to enter the EU.

The same medicines with the same labels will be available across the UK, without the barcode scanning requirements of the Protocol. Similarly, the framework ends the restrictions on movement of seed potatoes, oak trees and other plants between Northern Ireland and the rest of the UK.

Sunak said the agreement was ‘written in the language of laws and treaties. But really, it’s about much more than that. It’s about stability in Northern Ireland. It’s about real people and real businesses.’

Issue: 8015 / Categories: Legal News , Constitutional law , EU , Brexit
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Sidley—James Inness

Sidley—James Inness

Partner joins capital markets team in London office

Haynes Boone—William Cecil

Haynes Boone—William Cecil

Firm announces appointment of partner as UK general counsel

Devonshires—Nicholas Barrows

Devonshires—Nicholas Barrows

Firm appoints first chief marketing officer to drive growth strategy

NEWS
A seemingly dry procedural update may prove potent. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold explains that new CPR 31.12A—part of the 193rd update—fills a ‘lacuna’ exposed in McLaren Indy v Alpa Racing
The long-running Mazur saga edged towards its finale as the Court of Appeal heard arguments on whether non-solicitors can ‘conduct litigation’. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School reports from a packed courtroom where 16 wigs watched Nick Bacon KC argue that Mr Justice Sheldon had failed to distinguish between ‘tasks and responsibilities’

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
back-to-top-scroll