header-logo header-logo

All change in Northern Ireland?

01 March 2023
Issue: 8015 / Categories: Legal News , Constitutional law , EU , Brexit
printer mail-detail
Lawyers have been combing through the fine detail of the Windsor Framework, an agreement in principle on amending the Northern Ireland Protocol.

The government has scrapped the controversial Northern Ireland Protocol Bill as there is now ‘no legal justification’ for it. The EU will therefore drop the legal actions it launched against the UK over the Bill.

The framework, announced by Prime Minister Rishi Sunak and president of the European Commission Ursula von der Leyen this week, restricts the application of EU rules to the ‘minimum necessary’ so that less than 3% will be applicable. The oversight of the European Court of Justice is retained for matters of EU law only.

UK VAT and excise rules will now apply for alcoholic drinks for immediate consumption and immovable goods, whereas EU VAT rules could be applied under the Northern Ireland Protocol. However, EU VAT will still apply to other items.

A ‘Stormont brake’ is introduced, under which the Northern Ireland Assembly can oppose new EU goods rules that would have ‘significant and lasting effects’ on the people of Northern Ireland. In order to trigger the brake, the support of 30 members from at least two parties is required.

Bureaucracy on trade will be reduced through the use of a green lane and red lane, the former being used to fast-track goods intended to stay in Northern Ireland by removing customs checks and certifications. With a supermarket truck having to provide 500 certificates under the Northern Ireland Protocol, it can now simply make a declaration that the goods will stay in Northern Ireland. The red lane will be used for goods intended to enter the EU.

The same medicines with the same labels will be available across the UK, without the barcode scanning requirements of the Protocol. Similarly, the framework ends the restrictions on movement of seed potatoes, oak trees and other plants between Northern Ireland and the rest of the UK.

Sunak said the agreement was ‘written in the language of laws and treaties. But really, it’s about much more than that. It’s about stability in Northern Ireland. It’s about real people and real businesses.’

Issue: 8015 / Categories: Legal News , Constitutional law , EU , Brexit
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll