header-logo header-logo

11 February 2020 / Janet Paraskeva
Issue: 7874 / Categories: Opinion , Profession
printer mail-detail

All systems go: conveyancing 2030

15652
Janet Paraskeva shares some predictions for the future of conveyancing

It is an exciting time to be involved in the property sector as technology rapidly replaces old ways of operating. We are probably just a few short years away from a fully digital conveyancing system that promises a faster transaction and a better experience for all those involved.

Digitisation will open up a range of opportunities for improving the home buying and selling experience for consumers. But it will not come without risk, and raises questions for conveyancers as they seek to develop their businesses and for the Council for Licensed Conveyancers as their specialist. This is what we are exploring in our newly published discussion paper, ‘Conveyancing 2030’.

While there are many areas of the law where there is little public pressure for reform, that is not the case for property and efforts to speed up the process are already underway, with the government being helped by a stakeholder body, the Home Buying and Selling Group.

This year

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll