header-logo header-logo

24 April 2008
Issue: 7318 / Categories: Legal News , Public , Procedure & practice , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Amendment urged

In Brief

The Bar Council is urging peers to oppose a key provision of the Criminal Justice and Immigration Bill, which is currently being considered in the House of Lords. It wants the upper house to approve amendments to cl 55, which proposes to extend the powers of nonlegal CPS staff (designated case workers— DCWs) to conduct serious trials in magistrates’ courts. DCWs, the Bar says, need to be properly regulated and their remit should be restricted to summary-only, non-imprisonable offences. Bar Chairman Tim Dutton QC says: “Using non-legally qualified lay people to conduct prosecutions in trials which could end in imprisonment could place the public’s confidence in doubt, and result in longer trials, more appeals and cost the taxpayer more money.”

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
The Environment Agency can prosecute offences beyond environmental legislation where proceedings support its statutory functions, the Divisional Court has confirmed
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
back-to-top-scroll