header-logo header-logo

24 April 2008
Issue: 7318 / Categories: Legal News , Public , Procedure & practice , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Amendment urged

In Brief

The Bar Council is urging peers to oppose a key provision of the Criminal Justice and Immigration Bill, which is currently being considered in the House of Lords. It wants the upper house to approve amendments to cl 55, which proposes to extend the powers of nonlegal CPS staff (designated case workers— DCWs) to conduct serious trials in magistrates’ courts. DCWs, the Bar says, need to be properly regulated and their remit should be restricted to summary-only, non-imprisonable offences. Bar Chairman Tim Dutton QC says: “Using non-legally qualified lay people to conduct prosecutions in trials which could end in imprisonment could place the public’s confidence in doubt, and result in longer trials, more appeals and cost the taxpayer more money.”

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Browne Jacobson—Vicky Tomlinson

Browne Jacobson—Vicky Tomlinson

Browne Jacobson appoints Vicky Tomlinson as Head of Independent Health and Care

DWF—five appointments

DWF—five appointments

DWF further strengthens major injury and casualty offering with new partner and four directors from DAC Beachcroft

Switalskis—Laura Ornsby

Switalskis—Laura Ornsby

Switalskis strengthens Grimsby child care team

NEWS
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

back-to-top-scroll