header-logo header-logo

24 April 2008
Issue: 7318 / Categories: Legal News , Public , Procedure & practice , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Amendment urged

In Brief

The Bar Council is urging peers to oppose a key provision of the Criminal Justice and Immigration Bill, which is currently being considered in the House of Lords. It wants the upper house to approve amendments to cl 55, which proposes to extend the powers of nonlegal CPS staff (designated case workers— DCWs) to conduct serious trials in magistrates’ courts. DCWs, the Bar says, need to be properly regulated and their remit should be restricted to summary-only, non-imprisonable offences. Bar Chairman Tim Dutton QC says: “Using non-legally qualified lay people to conduct prosecutions in trials which could end in imprisonment could place the public’s confidence in doubt, and result in longer trials, more appeals and cost the taxpayer more money.”

MOVERS & SHAKERS

EIP—Stuart Malcolm

EIP—Stuart Malcolm

EIP strengthens Commercial practice with a new partner

Ellisons—Francesca Brown

Ellisons—Francesca Brown

Ellisons welcomes Francesca Brown to Family team

Shakespeare Martineau—Marie Bourke

Shakespeare Martineau—Marie Bourke

Shakespeare Martineau strengthens Sheffield regulatory practice with new hires

NEWS
A wide-ranging Civil Way column highlights developments from insolvency procedure to employment law, but one case stands out for its lessons on bankruptcy, family homes and digital communications
A sprawling Intellectual Property Office battle between House of Fraser and Frasers Property has delivered a masterclass in modern trade mark law
Courts in England and Wales and Singapore are increasingly confronting complex disputes over international child relocation as families become more globally mobile
The government’s long-awaited family law reform consultation could mark a turning point for domestic abuse victims navigating financial remedy proceedings, but significant challenges remain
A new commercial court pilot giving the public access to documents used in hearings, including expert reports, is raising difficult questions about transparency and privacy
back-to-top-scroll