header-logo header-logo

17 March 2021 / David Locke
Issue: 7925 / Categories: Features , Covid-19 , Profession
printer mail-detail

An ode to the old normal

42848
Not every change to our working lives post-COVID is a step forward: David Locke laments the loss of pre-pandemic positives

Despite the hyperbole, 2020 was neither unprecedented nor apocalyptic; yet the most pernicious phrase to gain traction, first in the media then across the professions, must surely be ‘the new normal’. When spoken, it tastes a bit like surrender. In action, it can look a bit like seizing upon the prevailing situation for commercial advantage. It is certainly not that we cannot learn many lessons from the ways in which the legal professions and institutions have adapted to the current crisis. However, some of those lessons may be that we were doing it rather well before. Consider these examples.

Courts

To generalise, the administrative function of the courts has been grievously affected by the pandemic. Applications are turned around much less efficiently than before, and hearings are being delayed. That is no criticism—it is entirely to be expected. However, the courts have by and large been admirably adept in

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll