header-logo header-logo

Safeguarding & duty of care in sport: an own goal?

60025
David Mayor & Alastair Gillespie discuss the breadth of the liability net for claims regarding safeguarding & duty of care in sport
  • High-profile sporting events attract the same general health and safety considerations as all public events, but they also carry additional event-specific, often significant, risk factors.
  • How do you reconcile vicarious liability and control when no clear boundaries exist?

The evening of 11 July 2021 should have been an occasion of immense national pride as England played Italy in the Euro 2020 Final at Wembley. Instead, we watched, appalled, as ticketless thugs stormed the stadium, heaping shame and embarrassment on the nation.

It is inevitable that questions would be asked in the wake of these events. After all, when things don’t go to plan, fingers are pointed. Stuck in the middle is the thin yellow line of stewards who have been left asking who was protecting them, and whether the independent review that has been commissioned by the Football Association

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

NEWS
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

back-to-top-scroll