header-logo header-logo

23 March 2007
Issue: 7265 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus , Profession
printer mail-detail

Angry lawyers protest against legal aid cuts

More than 1,000 legal aid solicitors took to the streets this week to protest against proposed changes to the legal aid system that they say will hit the poorest members of society.

The Access to Justice Alliance (AJA), a coalition of advice organisations including Citizens Advice, the Law Centres Federation, Shelter and the Legal Aid Practitioners Group, were lobbying Parliament to ask for a review of government proposals for legal aid reform. Keith Vaz and Frank Dobson were among MPs addressing the group.

The demonstrators argue that legal aid amounts to less than 0.5% of government expenditure, that the budget is ‘remarkably stable’, that legal aid rates have lost 23% of their value after a 10-year price freeze, and that the resulting exodus of firms from legal aid has created access difficulties in housing and social welfare law advice.

Legal Action Group policy director Michael MacNeil says: “We are currently discussing future action we can take to protest.” This is likely to take place in May.

Alison Hannah, chair of AJA,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers drives further growth in its UK immigration team with new partner Sophie Barrett-Brown

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal invests in next generation of legal talent as specialist litigation practice grows

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips continues momentum in London with arrival of Catrina Smith

NEWS
Restrictions on workplace non-disclosure agreements could make settlements slower, more complex and more expensive when reforms expected in 2027 take effect
Private prosecutors face closer scrutiny under Crown Prosecution Service guidance designed to strengthen accountability and consistency when intervention is requested
Foreign states cannot necessarily claim immunity for cyber operations launched abroad against computers in Britain, following a divided Supreme Court ruling
Defendants who make unsupported complaints about their lawyers risk losing legal aid while confiscation proceedings continue without representation
Lawyers advising Russian clients face different sanctions restrictions across the UK, EU and US, despite their shared objective of increasing pressure on Russia
back-to-top-scroll