header-logo header-logo

Anonymous wrongdoers

12 July 2007 / Andrew Horrocks , Jack Cundy
Issue: 7281 / Categories: Features , Technology
printer mail-detail

How can IT litigators fight back against anonymous e-commerce wrongdoers? Andrew Horrocks and Jack Cundy investigate

A frequent difficulty for would-be claimants trying to track down       anonymous e-commerce wrongdoers is that website operators and other IT service providers are unwilling to disclose voluntarily the identity of a wrongdoer, relying on contractual obligations of confidentiality and data protection legislation.

Users of IT services are aware of the potential for the internet to be used to invade their privacy, and service providers will therefore typically undertake—whether in a written agreement or in a published privacy policy—not to disclose voluntarily a user’s private data. In addition, the Data Protection Act 1998 (DPA 1998) ordinarily prevents disclosure of personal data without the consent of the data owner or an order of the court.

In these situations, there may be no claim against the service provider itself as a result of content of an offending website—the Electronic Commerce (EC Directive) Regulations 2002 (SI 2002/2013) and the Defamation Act 1996, for example, contain safeguards for service providers if they

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll