header-logo header-logo

05 March 2014 / Dr Jon Robins
Categories: Opinion , Legal aid focus
printer mail-detail

Another Gray(ling) day for justice

Jon Robins records the next steps in the government’s “dismantling” of publicly-funded law

Another month, another stand-off between the justice secretary and the legal profession. Defence lawyers are expected to march on the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) for a “Grayling Day” demo on Friday in a protest which will include speakers such as Paddy Hill of the Birmingham Six and Shami Chakrabarti of Liberty.

The government finally announced its response to the Transforming Legal Aid consultation last week. To remind civil law practitioners, this was a package of reforms which had at its heart the imposition of a system of price competitive tendering (PCT) where: (i) the number of solicitors’ firms would be slashed from 1,600 to 400; and (ii) bids would have to be 17.5% below current rates. So, for “transforming”, read “dismantling”. 

The Law Society forced a series of concessions from Chris Grayling (principally, dropping PCT and ensuring defendants kept their right to choose their own lawyer) but, for their efforts, received a humiliating vote of no confidence at

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Projects and rail practices strengthened by director hire in London

DWF—Stephen Hickling

DWF—Stephen Hickling

Real estate team in Birmingham welcomes back returning partner

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Firm invests in national growth with 44 appointments across five offices

NEWS
Refusing ADR is risky—but not always fatal. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed and Sanjay Dave Singh of the University of Leicester analyse Assensus Ltd v Wirsol Energy Ltd: despite repeated invitations to mediate, the defendant stood firm, made a £100,000 Part 36 offer and was ultimately ‘wholly vindicated’ at trial
The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 transformed criminal justice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ed Cape of UWE and Matthew Hardcastle and Sandra Paul of Kingsley Napley trace its ‘seismic impact’
Operational resilience is no longer optional. Writing in NLJ this week, Emma Radmore and Michael Lewis of Womble Bond Dickinson explain how UK regulators expect firms to identify ‘important business services’ that could cause ‘intolerable levels of harm’ if disrupted
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
back-to-top-scroll