header-logo header-logo

05 March 2014 / Dr Jon Robins
Categories: Opinion , Legal aid focus
printer mail-detail

Another Gray(ling) day for justice

Jon Robins records the next steps in the government’s “dismantling” of publicly-funded law

Another month, another stand-off between the justice secretary and the legal profession. Defence lawyers are expected to march on the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) for a “Grayling Day” demo on Friday in a protest which will include speakers such as Paddy Hill of the Birmingham Six and Shami Chakrabarti of Liberty.

The government finally announced its response to the Transforming Legal Aid consultation last week. To remind civil law practitioners, this was a package of reforms which had at its heart the imposition of a system of price competitive tendering (PCT) where: (i) the number of solicitors’ firms would be slashed from 1,600 to 400; and (ii) bids would have to be 17.5% below current rates. So, for “transforming”, read “dismantling”. 

The Law Society forced a series of concessions from Chris Grayling (principally, dropping PCT and ensuring defendants kept their right to choose their own lawyer) but, for their efforts, received a humiliating vote of no confidence at

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers drives further growth in its UK immigration team with new partner Sophie Barrett-Brown

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal invests in next generation of legal talent as specialist litigation practice grows

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips continues momentum in London with arrival of Catrina Smith

NEWS
Restrictions on workplace non-disclosure agreements could make settlements slower, more complex and more expensive when reforms expected in 2027 take effect
Private prosecutors face closer scrutiny under Crown Prosecution Service guidance designed to strengthen accountability and consistency when intervention is requested
Foreign states cannot necessarily claim immunity for cyber operations launched abroad against computers in Britain, following a divided Supreme Court ruling
Defendants who make unsupported complaints about their lawyers risk losing legal aid while confiscation proceedings continue without representation
Lawyers advising Russian clients face different sanctions restrictions across the UK, EU and US, despite their shared objective of increasing pressure on Russia
back-to-top-scroll