header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
19 November 2021 / Jamie Sutherland , Imogen Dodds
Issue: 7957 / Categories: Features , Property , Landlord&tenant
printer mail-detail

Another landlord bites the crust

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
64420
Jamie Sutherland & Imogen Dodds consider intention in opposed business lease renewals
  • New decision on intention which landlord must prove to oppose business lease renewals on redevelopment or own occupation grounds. Macey v Pizza Express (Restaurants) Limited.
  • Court can reject landlord’s evidence of subjective intention without finding him dishonest.
  • Practitioners should consider how landlord’s firm and settled intention can be demonstrated.

Under Part II of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 (LTA 1954), a landlord can oppose a business tenant’s right to a renewal tenancy by relying on the grounds set out in section 30(1)(a)–(g). These include that, on the termination of the existing tenancy, the landlord intends to redevelop the premises (ground (f)) or intends to occupy the premises for a business to be carried on by him, or as his residence (ground (g)).

The High Court’s decision in Macey v Pizza Express (Restaurants) Limited [2021] EWHC 2847 (Ch), [2021] All ER (D) 03 (Nov) is the latest case to consider the nature of the intention

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

McCarthy Denning—Harvey Knight & Martin Sandler

McCarthy Denning—Harvey Knight & Martin Sandler

Financial services and regulatory offering boosted by partner hires

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Short lets & sharp covenants
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
NLJ this week: Justice at the algorithm’s edge
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
NLJ this week: When ‘milk’ really means milk
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
NLJ this week: Civil practice with claws & caution
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
NLJ this week: Stealing virtual gold?
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll