header-logo header-logo

11 September 2008 / Janna Purdie
Issue: 7336 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Anti-suit injunctions

Janna Purdie reports on the opinion of the advocate general of the ECJ in the West Tankers case

Default judgment

Anti-suit injunctions giving effect to arbitration agreements are incompatible with the Judgments Regulation, according to the opinion of the advocate general of the ECJ, following a reference for a preliminary ruling from the House of Lords.

Facts leading to the requirement for an ECJ opinion

In August 2000 a vessel owned by West Tankers was under charter. The charter party contained an arbitration agreement with a London arbitration seat and for any arbitration to be governed by English law. While under charter, the vessel collided with a jetty causing damage. The claimants, as insurers, paid out for the damage to the jetty. Various proceedings and arbitrations were commenced:

      
      ●     London arbitration—the owner of the jetty started an arbitration against West Tankers in London to recover uninsured losses.
      
      ●     Italian court proceedings—the insurers started court proceedings in Italy against West Tankers to recover the monies paid out under the insurance policy.

      

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Construction team bolstered by hire of senior consultant duo

Switalskis—four appointments

Switalskis—four appointments

Firm expands residential conveyancing team with quadruple appointment

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

Private client team welcomes senior associatein Worcester

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll