header-logo header-logo

Apil president attacks “fundamental dishonesty”

23 April 2015
Issue: 7649 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

New Association of Personal Injury Lawyers (Apil) president Jonathan Wheeler has hit out at the government’s “Orwellian double-speak” over court fees.

Speaking at Apil’s annual conference this week, Wheeler singled out the Criminal Justice and Courts Act 2015 for criticism. Under s 57 of the Act, judges are obliged to strike out personal injury claims where there is a finding of “fundamentally dishonesty”, unless the decision would lead to “substantial injustice”. However, Wheeler asked about defendants who set out to delay a settlement brought on behalf of a terminally ill claimant, because it would be cheaper to pay out on the claim when they are dead. “Why aren’t such defendant practices also caught by legislation?” He went on to brand the recent hikes in civil court fees of up to 600% as “a tax on clients’ misery”. “The government call these ‘enhanced court fees’. Enhanced means ‘improved’. What kind of Orwellian double-speak is being used here?” he said.

Issue: 7649 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll