header-logo header-logo

Apil president attacks “fundamental dishonesty”

23 April 2015
Issue: 7649 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

New Association of Personal Injury Lawyers (Apil) president Jonathan Wheeler has hit out at the government’s “Orwellian double-speak” over court fees.

Speaking at Apil’s annual conference this week, Wheeler singled out the Criminal Justice and Courts Act 2015 for criticism. Under s 57 of the Act, judges are obliged to strike out personal injury claims where there is a finding of “fundamentally dishonesty”, unless the decision would lead to “substantial injustice”. However, Wheeler asked about defendants who set out to delay a settlement brought on behalf of a terminally ill claimant, because it would be cheaper to pay out on the claim when they are dead. “Why aren’t such defendant practices also caught by legislation?” He went on to brand the recent hikes in civil court fees of up to 600% as “a tax on clients’ misery”. “The government call these ‘enhanced court fees’. Enhanced means ‘improved’. What kind of Orwellian double-speak is being used here?” he said.

Issue: 7649 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
back-to-top-scroll