header-logo header-logo

06 February 2026 / Nick Marsh , Alex Bromwich
Issue: 8148 / Categories: Features , Arbitration , Jurisdiction , ADR
printer mail-detail

Approach with caution

241908

Nick Marsh & Alex Bromwich on s 72 of the Arbitration Act 1996: three 2025 judgments show that parties should act promptly & plead consistently

  • Section 72 of the Arbitration Act 1996 allows a non-participating party who denies being bound by an arbitration agreement to challenge the tribunal’s jurisdiction.
  • The courts have apply s 72 generously to protect party autonomy, but inconsistent jurisdictional objections can forfeit s 72 protection.
  • Three 2025 cases stress that jurisdictional challenges must be raised promptly and clearly.

Section 72 of the UK Arbitration Act 1996 (AA 1996) concerns the rights of parties who are alleged to be parties to an agreement to arbitrate but who have taken no part in arbitration proceedings to challenge awards. Its first limb (s 72(1)) empowers such persons to apply to the court for a declaration, injunction or other appropriate relief in respect of the following questions:

i. Is there a valid arbitration agreement?

ii. Has the tribunal been properly constituted? and

iii. Have the matters referred to arbitration

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll