header-logo header-logo

04 August 2011
Issue: 7477 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Arbitration

Jivraj v Hashwani [2011] UKSC 40, [2011] All ER (D) 246 (Jul)

The essential questions in relation to regs 2 and 6 of the Employment Equality (Religion or Belief) Regulations 2003 (SI 2003/1660), were whether, on the one hand, the person concerned performed services for and under the direction of another person in return for which he or she received remuneration or, on the other hand, he or she was an independent provider of services who was not in a relationship of subordination with the person who received the services.

Those were broad questions which depended upon the circumstances of the particular case and upon a detailed consideration of the relationship between the parties. The Regulations were not applicable to the selection, engagement or appointment of arbitrators, and accordingly the requirement in an arbitration agreement that the arbitrators should be members of the Ismaili community did not render the agreement void or unenforceable. 
 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Stephen Ward, The Barrister Group

NLJ Career Profile: Stephen Ward, The Barrister Group

From mowing lawns to life at the Bar: Stephen Ward reflects on an unconventional career

Clarke Willmott—Ben Loosemore

Clarke Willmott—Ben Loosemore

Commercial property partner joins Clarke Willmott in Southampton

Ellisons—Robert Tiffen

Ellisons—Robert Tiffen

Robert Tiffen joins Ellisons as Partner in growing Norwich office

NEWS
The Law Society RFC Festival of Sport returns next month, bringing together legal and financial services professionals for one of the sector’s largest annual sporting events
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

back-to-top-scroll