header-logo header-logo

02 February 2012
Issue: 7499 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Arbitration

West Tankers Inc v Allianz Spa and another [2012] EWCA Civ 27, [2012] All ER (D) 127 (Jan)

In an appropriate case the court might give leave for an arbitral award to be enforced in the same manner as might be achieved by an action on the award and so give leave for judgment to be entered in the terms of the award. The court had to make a judicial determination whether it was appropriate to enter a judgment in the terms of the award.

At common law, a party to an arbitration who had obtained a declaratory award in his favour could bring an action on the award and the court, if it thought appropriate, could make a declaration in the same terms. The purpose of s 66 of the Arbitration Act 1996 was to provide a simpler alternative route to bringing an action on the award and the court, although the latter possibility was expressly preserved by s 66(4) of the Act.
 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Switalskis—five appointments

Switalskis—five appointments

Firm expands national abuse compensation team

Mathys & Squire—nine promotions

Mathys & Squire—nine promotions

IP firm announces new partners and senior promotions across UK offices

Carey Olsen—five promotions

Carey Olsen—five promotions

Carey Olsen promotes five lawyers to the partnership

NEWS
A High Court ruling has sent a jolt through the legal profession after a newly qualified solicitor used an internal AI tool to produce court correspondence containing a fabricated legal citation
A significant data privacy ruling has clarified what counts as valid consent under UK data protection law
Executors may be overlooking billions of pounds in estate assets hidden in forgotten investments and misplaced share certificates
Britain’s booming non-surgical cosmetics market is operating in what some critics describe as a regulatory ‘Wild West’
Family contact disputes are becoming an increasingly prominent feature of Court of Protection litigation
back-to-top-scroll