header-logo header-logo

17 January 2014
Issue: 7590 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Arbitration

Habas Sinai Ve Tibbi Gazlar Istihsal Endustrisi AS v VSC Steel Company Ltd [2013] EWHC 4071 (Comm), [2014] All ER (D) 01 (Jan)

It was settled law that the principle of openness and fair dealing between the parties to an arbitration demanded not merely that, if jurisdiction was to be challenged under s 67 of the Arbitration Act 1996, the issue as to jurisdiction had to normally have been raised, at least on some grounds, before the arbitrator but that each ground of challenge to his jurisdiction had to previously have been raised before the arbitrator if it was to be raised in an application under s 67 of the 1996 Act challenging the award. It was clear from authority that the term “any objection” in s 73(1) of the 1996 Act was intended to mean “any ground of objection”. 

Moreover, the fact that parties contemplated that there would be a signed contract did not necessarily mean that there could be no binding agreement until the contract was signed. Each case depended on its facts.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Switalskis—Sally Ann Masih, Suzy Overton & Jane Beaumont

Switalskis—Sally Ann Masih, Suzy Overton & Jane Beaumont

Trio of recruits strengthens Switalskis residential property team

Ward Hadaway—Steven Hayward

Ward Hadaway—Steven Hayward

Birmingham law firm appoints construction partner

Flint Bishop—six appointments

Flint Bishop—six appointments

Flint Bishop accelerates Northern growth through strategic senior appointments

NEWS
A High Court decision has clarified that a home may be unfit for human habitation not only where conditions endanger health or safety, but also where they seriously undermine comfort and convenience

A longer time limit for employment tribunal claims, new charity law thresholds, property tribunal recruitment and appellate guidance on small-claims costs feature in the latest Civil Way round-up

A recent High Court ruling could make issue estoppel considerably more complex in cross-border litigation, requiring parties to consider the foreign law governing the underlying claim
The Supreme Court has overturned Cheshire West’s bright-line test for deprivation of liberty, replacing it with a broader, more contextual assessment that gives greater weight to an individual’s wishes, feelings and apparent consent
Jonathan Fisher KC’s wide-ranging fraud report contains worthwhile proposals, but turning them into workable reform will require money, capacity and political will
back-to-top-scroll