header-logo header-logo

Arbitration

07 February 2014
Issue: 7593 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Wales & West Utilities Ltd v PPS Pipeline Systems GmbH [2014] EWHC 54 (TCC), [2014] All ER (D) 215 (Jan)

It was settled law that the courts had sought to discourage losing parties in adjudications from “scrabbling around to find some argument, however tenuous”. However, the courts had to objectively consider and analyse all arguments about jurisdiction to see if they fell into the “tenuous” category; if they did, the court’s sanction would then be invariably by way of costs order, possibly by way of indemnity costs the more tenuous the argument had been. When the jurisdiction of a person appointed to make a decision under a contract, such as an adjudicator, was called into question, it was always necessary to ascertain with precision what the decision-maker was authorised to do. A vital and necessary question, when a jurisdictional challenge was mounted, was to ask what had actually been referred. That required a careful characterisation of the dispute. To determine the scope and ambit of any given dispute, the court needed to analyse the relevant exchanges between the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
back-to-top-scroll