header-logo header-logo

Arbitration

07 February 2014
Issue: 7593 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Wales & West Utilities Ltd v PPS Pipeline Systems GmbH [2014] EWHC 54 (TCC), [2014] All ER (D) 215 (Jan)

It was settled law that the courts had sought to discourage losing parties in adjudications from “scrabbling around to find some argument, however tenuous”. However, the courts had to objectively consider and analyse all arguments about jurisdiction to see if they fell into the “tenuous” category; if they did, the court’s sanction would then be invariably by way of costs order, possibly by way of indemnity costs the more tenuous the argument had been. When the jurisdiction of a person appointed to make a decision under a contract, such as an adjudicator, was called into question, it was always necessary to ascertain with precision what the decision-maker was authorised to do. A vital and necessary question, when a jurisdictional challenge was mounted, was to ask what had actually been referred. That required a careful characterisation of the dispute. To determine the scope and ambit of any given dispute, the court needed to analyse the relevant exchanges between the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DWF—19 appointments

DWF—19 appointments

Belfast team bolstered by three senior hires and 16 further appointments

Cadwalader—Andro Atlaga

Cadwalader—Andro Atlaga

Firm strengthens leveraged finance team with London partner hire

Knights—Ella Dodgson & Rebecca Laffan

Knights—Ella Dodgson & Rebecca Laffan

Double hire marks launch of family team in Leeds

NEWS
Small law firms want to embrace technology but feel lost in a maze of jargon, costs and compliance fears, writes Aisling O’Connell of the Solicitors Regulation Authority in this week's NLJ
The Supreme Court issued a landmark judgment in July that overturned the convictions of Tom Hayes and Carlo Palombo, once poster boys of the Libor and Euribor scandal. In NLJ this week, Neil Swift of Peters & Peters considers what the ruling means for financial law enforcement
Charlie Mercer and Astrid Gillam of Stewarts crunch the numbers on civil fraud claims in the English courts, in this week's NLJ. New data shows civil fraud claims rising steadily since 2014, with the King’s Bench Division overtaking the Commercial Court as the forum of choice for lower-value disputes
Bea Rossetto of the National Pro Bono Centre makes the case for ‘General Practice Pro Bono’—using core legal skills to deliver life-changing support, without the need for niche expertise—in this week's NLJ
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve reports on Haynes v Thomson, the first judicial application of the Supreme Court’s For Women Scotland ruling in a discrimination claim, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll