header-logo header-logo

26 November 2021 / Hannah Gumbrill-Ward
Issue: 7958 / Categories: Features , Family , ADR , Arbitration
printer mail-detail

Arbitration in family cases: another way

Hannah Gumbrill-Ward shares the pros & cons of the use of arbitration in family proceedings
  • The time for arbitration to play a bigger role in family proceedings has come.

Family practitioners (and their clients) are all too aware of the current crisis in the family court. At the Jersey International Family Law Conference last month, President of the Family Division, Sir Andrew McFarlane, concluded his speech by acknowledging that ‘the Family Court is not currently in a good place’ adding that ‘the substantial backlog that existed before the pandemic has now grown very substantially’. The 14% increase in the number of new cases started in the family court during the second quarter of this year, following a 7% rise in the first quarter, has done nothing to help alleviate this substantial backlog.

As well as those directly involved in family proceedings, the crisis has also attracted the attention of the Lord Chancellor, who is apparently now drawing up plans to impose penalties on parents deemed to be ‘clogging up’

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll