header-logo header-logo

Arbitration in family cases: another way

26 November 2021 / Hannah Gumbrill-Ward
Issue: 7958 / Categories: Features , Family , ADR , Arbitration
printer mail-detail
Hannah Gumbrill-Ward shares the pros & cons of the use of arbitration in family proceedings
  • The time for arbitration to play a bigger role in family proceedings has come.

Family practitioners (and their clients) are all too aware of the current crisis in the family court. At the Jersey International Family Law Conference last month, President of the Family Division, Sir Andrew McFarlane, concluded his speech by acknowledging that ‘the Family Court is not currently in a good place’ adding that ‘the substantial backlog that existed before the pandemic has now grown very substantially’. The 14% increase in the number of new cases started in the family court during the second quarter of this year, following a 7% rise in the first quarter, has done nothing to help alleviate this substantial backlog.

As well as those directly involved in family proceedings, the crisis has also attracted the attention of the Lord Chancellor, who is apparently now drawing up plans to impose penalties on parents deemed to be ‘clogging up’

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll