header-logo header-logo

13 April 2007 / Louis Flannery KC
Issue: 7268 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Profession , Arbitration
printer mail-detail

Arbitration rules

Louis Flannery reviews two important appellate decisions showing judicial support for arbitration

In Fiona Trust and Holding Corp v Privalov [2007] EWCA Civ 20, [2007] All ER (D) 169 (Jan), the Court of Appeal looked at the concept of separability of arbitration clauses in contracts. It grappled with problems that arise where a party to a contract containing an arbitration clause allegedly tainted by illegality seeks to challenge the jurisdiction of the arbitrator to consider any claims under the contract.

In West Tankers Inc v AS Riunione Adriatica di Sicurta SpA, The Front Comor [2007] UKHL 4, [2007] All ER (D) 249 (Feb), the House of Lords referred to the European Court of Justice (ECJ) the question of whether or not anti-suit injunctions are still available to restrain court proceedings brought in breach of an arbitration clause following two recent ECJ decisions that might suggest otherwise.

Fiona Trust: the facts

The contracts in Fiona Trust and Holding Corpn v Privalov [2006] EWHC 2583 (Comm), [2007] 1 All ER (Comm) 81, were time

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll