header-logo header-logo

Arbitration rules

13 April 2007 / Louis Flannery KC
Issue: 7268 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Profession , Arbitration
printer mail-detail

Louis Flannery reviews two important appellate decisions showing judicial support for arbitration

In Fiona Trust and Holding Corp v Privalov [2007] EWCA Civ 20, [2007] All ER (D) 169 (Jan), the Court of Appeal looked at the concept of separability of arbitration clauses in contracts. It grappled with problems that arise where a party to a contract containing an arbitration clause allegedly tainted by illegality seeks to challenge the jurisdiction of the arbitrator to consider any claims under the contract.

In West Tankers Inc v AS Riunione Adriatica di Sicurta SpA, The Front Comor [2007] UKHL 4, [2007] All ER (D) 249 (Feb), the House of Lords referred to the European Court of Justice (ECJ) the question of whether or not anti-suit injunctions are still available to restrain court proceedings brought in breach of an arbitration clause following two recent ECJ decisions that might suggest otherwise.

Fiona Trust: the facts

The contracts in Fiona Trust and Holding Corpn v Privalov [2006] EWHC 2583 (Comm), [2007] 1 All ER (Comm) 81, were time

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll