header-logo header-logo

09 September 2016 / Tamara Goriely
Issue: 7713 / Categories: Features , Arbitration , ADR
printer mail-detail

Arbitration in the spotlight

Should the Law Commission look at issues in arbitration law? Tamara Goriely outlines the 13th programme

Every three years, the Law Commission consults the public on which areas of law need reform, to inform our next programme of work. This year, we are seeking suggestions for our 13th programme, to start in 2017. In our “Call for Ideas” discussion paper we highlight arbitration as one potential area for further work, and are considering several discrete topics (see www.lawcom.gov.uk).

Trust disputes

One possible change would be to allow for the arbitration of trust disputes. While some trust disputes may be suitable for arbitration, it seems that at present those who create trusts cannot require trustees and beneficiaries to use arbitration, rather than litigation, to resolve their differences. Furthermore, although two or more people of full capacity can enter into a valid stand-alone arbitration agreement to settle a trust dispute, any award will not bind other interested parties.

Should the Law Commission consider potential reforms to develop the law in this area,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll