header-logo header-logo

Arbitration vs litigation...never the twain shall meet?

19 March 2020 / Shantanu Majumdar KC
Issue: 7879 / Categories: Features , Profession , ADR , Arbitration
printer mail-detail
17919
Shantanu Majumdar QC considers some aspects of the supposed division between arbitration & litigation
  • The court’s involvement in the arbitral process and the effect of arbitration on the courts.

Arbitration is a private dispute resolution process which effectively involves the parties to the arbitration agreement contracting out of the rights which they would otherwise have to submit their disputes for resolution by a national court.

In that sense, the parties to an arbitration agreement make a choice which excludes the court. ‘Arbitration-friendly’ jurisdictions recognise and respect the parties’ right to make that choice. Yet, even as, say, the English court therefore stays proceedings brought in respect of a matter which is subject to an arbitration agreement (under s 9 of the Arbitration Act 1996 (AA 1996)) or grants an injunction restraining a party’s pursuit of such proceedings in a foreign court, it demonstrates how integral the court can be (and the arbitration law which it applies is) to the successful fulfilment

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll