header-logo header-logo

Arbitration vs litigation...never the twain shall meet?

19 March 2020 / Shantanu Majumdar KC
Issue: 7879 / Categories: Features , Profession , ADR , Arbitration
printer mail-detail
17919
Shantanu Majumdar QC considers some aspects of the supposed division between arbitration & litigation
  • The court’s involvement in the arbitral process and the effect of arbitration on the courts.

Arbitration is a private dispute resolution process which effectively involves the parties to the arbitration agreement contracting out of the rights which they would otherwise have to submit their disputes for resolution by a national court.

In that sense, the parties to an arbitration agreement make a choice which excludes the court. ‘Arbitration-friendly’ jurisdictions recognise and respect the parties’ right to make that choice. Yet, even as, say, the English court therefore stays proceedings brought in respect of a matter which is subject to an arbitration agreement (under s 9 of the Arbitration Act 1996 (AA 1996)) or grants an injunction restraining a party’s pursuit of such proceedings in a foreign court, it demonstrates how integral the court can be (and the arbitration law which it applies is) to the successful fulfilment

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll