header-logo header-logo

05 August 2022 / Stephen Gold
Issue: 7990 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Civil way
printer mail-detail

NLJ200 Archive Civil way: 5 August 2022

Stephen Gold can’t get enough of the archives. This month he has had his nose in The Law Journal for 1925 and encounters much merriment at the Law Society & some hotel sheets

New management

By 1925 it was all happening over at 37 Essex Street. With the Law of Property Acts soon due to terrify the nation’s conveyancers, the editor cum proprietor wisely decided to get out, save for a seat on the board, and leave the fee simples to somebody else. Mr J M Lightwood was poached from the top job at the Solicitors Journal to become editor in chief of its competitor. He appears to have been the ‘JML’ hiding behind the weekly articles on the new legislation, the penance to which he subjected himself over the next twelve months. If there had been some conference organisers around willing to take over the Royal Albert Hall or a Lyons Corner House, they would have made a killing. As it was, the only educational advertisements carried by

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll