header-logo header-logo

12 August 2011 / Dominic Regan
Issue: 7478 / Categories: Opinion , Costs
printer mail-detail

The Jackson reforms: winners & losers

Dominic Regan sifts through the Jackson winners & losers

“Inevitably, there will be winners and losers as a result of my proposals” declared Lord Justice Jackson on that bitter January morning last year when he introduced his radical proposals for reform. Intriguingly, some perceived “winners” are looking like losers. Who and why so?

Clause 43

Before we delve into this there is one out and out loser and that is the after the event (ATE) insurance market. Clause 43 of the Legal Aid Bill precludes the recovery of such premiums (except where cover is taken out in clinical negligence cases in respect of expert fees).

The planned extension of the existing portal claims scheme will remove vast tranches of work from the land of risk. The present road traffic accident portal is risk free in the opening stages. Only a tiny minority of cases enter stage 3 where there is the possibility of an adverse costs outcome.

One-way costs shifting

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
back-to-top-scroll