header-logo header-logo

The Jackson reforms: winners & losers

12 August 2011 / Dominic Regan
Issue: 7478 / Categories: Opinion , Costs
printer mail-detail

Dominic Regan sifts through the Jackson winners & losers

“Inevitably, there will be winners and losers as a result of my proposals” declared Lord Justice Jackson on that bitter January morning last year when he introduced his radical proposals for reform. Intriguingly, some perceived “winners” are looking like losers. Who and why so?

Clause 43

Before we delve into this there is one out and out loser and that is the after the event (ATE) insurance market. Clause 43 of the Legal Aid Bill precludes the recovery of such premiums (except where cover is taken out in clinical negligence cases in respect of expert fees).

The planned extension of the existing portal claims scheme will remove vast tranches of work from the land of risk. The present road traffic accident portal is risk free in the opening stages. Only a tiny minority of cases enter stage 3 where there is the possibility of an adverse costs outcome.

One-way costs shifting

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Cryptocurrency is reshaping financial remedy cases, warns Robert Webster of Maguire Family Law in NLJ this week. Digital assets—concealable, volatile and hard to trace—are fuelling suspicions of hidden wealth, yet Form E still lacks a section for crypto-disclosure
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold surveys a flurry of procedural reforms in his latest 'Civil way' column
back-to-top-scroll