header-logo header-logo

Arrested development

27 May 2020 / William Tyzack
Issue: 7888 / Categories: Features , Covid-19 , Property
printer mail-detail
21415
Development in lockdown: the pitfalls of an approaching deadline & compliance with permission conditions. William Tyzack reports
  • Minimal commencement of works: an obvious solution?
  • Difficulty in complying with pre-commencement conditions: the options available.
  • Coronavirus: challenges of protecting the workforce.

Pursuant to s 91 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (TCPA 1990) development work subject to a grant of planning permission must be begun within a period of three years, unless the planning authority has imposed, when granting permission, a different duration (whether longer or shorter). It is, furthermore, not permissible for a planning authority to extend the deadline by agreement with the landowner or developer. Conditions controlling the way in which the planning permission must be implemented may also be imposed by the planning authority, which may include works that are required to take place before the development work begins. These ‘pre-commencement works’ could include, for instance, discontinuance of any existing land use, removal of buildings, certain access or drainage works, or landscaping.

While recent relaxation of lockdown restrictions,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll