header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
12 February 2020
Issue: 7874 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail

Art history

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
A rare chance has arisen to buy art with a legal history

Legal art publisher Hanna Fine Art is selling a highly-collectable fine art print of British artist Stephen McClean’s painting of the Royal Courts of Justice in a limited edition of 950 prints, every one of which will be signed by the Lord Chief Justice, Lord Burnett.

Hanna Fine Art stated: ‘To preserve the value and rarity of the print, it will be available only to members of the legal profession and no further prints will ever be published or signed outside this exclusive edition, creating a strong secondary market for investors.’

The print is expected to raise £50,000 for British legal charities, including the London Legal Support Trust. A print can be reserved for £295 by contacting Maria at maria@hannafineart.co.uk.

Copyright © 2020 Hanna Fine Art, All rights reserved. 

Issue: 7874 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Projects and rail practices strengthened by director hire in London

DWF—Stephen Hickling

DWF—Stephen Hickling

Real estate team in Birmingham welcomes back returning partner

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Firm invests in national growth with 44 appointments across five offices

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: 40 years on, has PACE lost its edge?
The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 transformed criminal justice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ed Cape of UWE and Matthew Hardcastle and Sandra Paul of Kingsley Napley trace its ‘seismic impact’
NLJ this week: Stress-testing the City
Operational resilience is no longer optional. Writing in NLJ this week, Emma Radmore and Michael Lewis of Womble Bond Dickinson explain how UK regulators expect firms to identify ‘important business services’ that could cause ‘intolerable levels of harm’ if disrupted
NLJ this week: How sure is ‘sure’ enough?
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
NLJ this week: A deferred prosecution reprieve
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
NLJ this week: Mandelson, Epstein & the court of popular opinion
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll