header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
08 January 2010 / Rehana Azib
Issue: 7399 / Categories: Features , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Asbestos exposure

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Rehana Azib explains why 2009 was a bad year for defendants

n Karen Sienkiewicz (Administratrix of the Estate of Enid Costello, Deceased) v Greif (UK)Ltd [2009] EWCA Civ 1159, the Court of Appeal examined the issue of causation in the context of the Compensation Act 2006 (CA 2006), s 3.

The court at first instance had ordered that the claim for damages for death due to mesothelioma be dismissed where the claimant had been an office worker at a steel-drum factory. Asbestos dust had been released during the manufacturing process and the deceased’s duties had taken her all over the factory, including the areas that had been contaminated by asbestos.

Furthermore, she had been exposed to a low level of asbestos dust in the general atmosphere, along with other inhabitants in her local area.

The total tortious exposure was found to be modest compared with the total environmental exposure and had not more than doubled the risk of non-tortious exposure.

An appeal was made on behalf of the deceased that all that had to be

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

Fieldfisher partner appointed president as LSLA marks milestone year

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Firm promotes two lawyers to partnership across employment and family

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Firm promotes five lawyers to partnership across key growth areas

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Your magistrates’ court needs you!
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
NLJ this week: Clarity on whistleblowing, settlements and tribunal limits
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll