header-logo header-logo

Asbestos exposure

08 January 2010 / Rehana Azib
Issue: 7399 / Categories: Features , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Rehana Azib explains why 2009 was a bad year for defendants

n Karen Sienkiewicz (Administratrix of the Estate of Enid Costello, Deceased) v Greif (UK)Ltd [2009] EWCA Civ 1159, the Court of Appeal examined the issue of causation in the context of the Compensation Act 2006 (CA 2006), s 3.

The court at first instance had ordered that the claim for damages for death due to mesothelioma be dismissed where the claimant had been an office worker at a steel-drum factory. Asbestos dust had been released during the manufacturing process and the deceased’s duties had taken her all over the factory, including the areas that had been contaminated by asbestos.

Furthermore, she had been exposed to a low level of asbestos dust in the general atmosphere, along with other inhabitants in her local area.

The total tortious exposure was found to be modest compared with the total environmental exposure and had not more than doubled the risk of non-tortious exposure.

An appeal was made on behalf of the deceased that all that had to be

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll