header-logo header-logo

14 May 2021 / Mark Pawlowski
Issue: 7932 / Categories: Features , Property , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

Ashes to ashes, dust to dust: property rights in body parts

48976
Mark Pawlowski considers whether English law recognises property rights in a dead body or bodily parts
  • English and Commonwealth caselaw on the recognition of dead bodies, body parts and bodily products as ‘property’.

The general rule is that when a human being dies, property in their body does not vest in anyone, although certain persons have duties, and thus rights, with respect to it. In Williams v Williams (1882) 20 Ch D 659, at p664, Kay J stated: ‘The law of this country recognises no property in a corpse’. It is for this reason that testamentary directions with regard to the disposal of one’s corpse (‘I wish to be cremated and my ashes scattered . . .’) are, at best, precatory.

In Dobson v North Tyneside Health Authority [1996] 4 All ER 474, the Court of Appeal confirmed the orthodox view that, subject to certain limited exceptions, there is no property in a dead body under English law. The case concerned a

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Stephen Ward, The Barrister Group

NLJ Career Profile: Stephen Ward, The Barrister Group

From mowing lawns to life at the Bar: Stephen Ward reflects on an unconventional career

Clarke Willmott—Ben Loosemore

Clarke Willmott—Ben Loosemore

Commercial property partner joins Clarke Willmott in Southampton

Ellisons—Robert Tiffen

Ellisons—Robert Tiffen

Robert Tiffen joins Ellisons as Partner in growing Norwich office

NEWS
The Law Society RFC Festival of Sport returns next month, bringing together legal and financial services professionals for one of the sector’s largest annual sporting events
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

back-to-top-scroll