header-logo header-logo

Assessment matters

08 December 2017 / David Burrows
Issue: 7773 / Categories: Features , Child law , Family
printer mail-detail
nlj_7773_burrows

David Burrows presents a master class in child understanding & capacity

  • Assessment of a child’s understanding is complementary to law in relation to understanding under Mental Capacity Act 2005.
  • Gillick remains the basis for assessment of understanding.
  • Understanding is issue-specific: it must be tested according to the issue in hand and with all age-appropriate information available.

In Re S (Child as Parent: Adoption: Consent) [2017] EWHC 2729 (Fam) Cobb J sets out the legal framework for professional assessment of understanding of the process and effect of adoption for a mother, S, who is ‘under 16 years of age’. She suffers from ‘developmental delay and learning difficulties’ ([2]). She has not seen her child T whom she wants adopted. ‘Child’ is defined as a person not yet 18 (Children Act 1989 (CA 1989), s 105(1)), though this article is concerned mostly with a child of under 16.

The case is of significance more widely than to capacity and adoption. It reviews the question of understanding and Gillick -competence in children proceedings generally, though

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll