header-logo header-logo

08 December 2017 / David Burrows
Issue: 7773 / Categories: Features , Child law , Family
printer mail-detail

Assessment matters

nlj_7773_burrows

David Burrows presents a master class in child understanding & capacity

  • Assessment of a child’s understanding is complementary to law in relation to understanding under Mental Capacity Act 2005.
  • Gillick remains the basis for assessment of understanding.
  • Understanding is issue-specific: it must be tested according to the issue in hand and with all age-appropriate information available.

In Re S (Child as Parent: Adoption: Consent) [2017] EWHC 2729 (Fam) Cobb J sets out the legal framework for professional assessment of understanding of the process and effect of adoption for a mother, S, who is ‘under 16 years of age’. She suffers from ‘developmental delay and learning difficulties’ ([2]). She has not seen her child T whom she wants adopted. ‘Child’ is defined as a person not yet 18 (Children Act 1989 (CA 1989), s 105(1)), though this article is concerned mostly with a child of under 16.

The case is of significance more widely than to capacity and adoption. It reviews the question of understanding and Gillick -competence in children proceedings generally, though

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

Senior appointments in insurance services and commercial services announced

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Aviation disputes practice strengthened by London partner hire

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Residential property lawyer promoted to partnership

NEWS
he abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC
Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll