header-logo header-logo

03 July 2008 / Richard Scorer
Issue: 7328 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

Assisting death

Terminally ill patients should have the right to choose when to die…and who should help them, says Richard Scorer

Assisting a person to die is against the law of England and Wales. Section 2 (1) of the Suicide Act 1961 (SA 1961) provides that:

        “A person who aids, abets, counsels or procures the suicide of another, or an attempt by another to commit suicide, shall be liable on conviction or indictment to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 14 years”.

This provision gives rise to appalling dilemmas for a particular group of individuals: those who are suffering unbearably in the context of terminal illness and who wish to take steps to ensure a dignified death in a manner and at a time of their own choosing.

One such individual is Debbie Purdy. Purdy is 45 years old and lives with her husband. In 1995 she was diagnosed with Primary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis (MS), a degenerative disease which has already significantly impaired Purdy's physical ability. There is no cure for MS and recent developments in treatment,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll