header-logo header-logo

Asylum

27 November 2009
Issue: 7395 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

R (on the application of EW) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2009] EWHC 2957 (Admin)

The issue before the court concerned whether, having regard to the Italian immigration system and the conditions in that state generally, the secretary of state’s decision to certify an asylum claim, and thus the obligation then to transfer the asylum seeker to Italy, involved a breach of Art 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights.

The court held that there was no general right to accommodation or a minimum standard of living that could be drawn from the convention or the Directives, or from elsewhere in the European or domestic human rights, social or other legislation.

The setting of such a minimum standard—no matter how low—was a matter for social legislation, not the courts. The court had to adopt a cautious approach to ensure that it did not inappropriately encroach into areas reserved to the political decision of the executive government.

 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll