header-logo header-logo

03 July 2015
Issue: 7659 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Asylum fast-track suspended

The Court of Appeal has suspended the controversial detained fast-track (DFT) system which keeps asylum seekers in detention while legal hearings and appeals take place.

The High Court ruled the process unlawful on 12 June, in Detention Action v First-tier Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) & Ors [2015] EWHC 1689 (Admin), but stayed the decision pending a ruling by the Court of Appeal. Mr Justice Nicol found that the fast track rules “incorporate structural unfairness” and “put the appellant at a serious procedural disadvantage” due to the “abbreviated timetable and curtailed case management powers”.

Ruling at the Court of Appeal last week, Lord Justice Sullivan quashed the stay and held DFT must end immediately because if cases continued to be dealt with by the system, they could end up needing to be heard again, which would be a “very horrible waste of money”.

Issue: 7659 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Construction team bolstered by hire of senior consultant duo

Switalskis—four appointments

Switalskis—four appointments

Firm expands residential conveyancing team with quadruple appointment

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

Private client team welcomes senior associatein Worcester

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll