header-logo header-logo

Asylum fast-track suspended

03 July 2015
Issue: 7659 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

The Court of Appeal has suspended the controversial detained fast-track (DFT) system which keeps asylum seekers in detention while legal hearings and appeals take place.

The High Court ruled the process unlawful on 12 June, in Detention Action v First-tier Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) & Ors [2015] EWHC 1689 (Admin), but stayed the decision pending a ruling by the Court of Appeal. Mr Justice Nicol found that the fast track rules “incorporate structural unfairness” and “put the appellant at a serious procedural disadvantage” due to the “abbreviated timetable and curtailed case management powers”.

Ruling at the Court of Appeal last week, Lord Justice Sullivan quashed the stay and held DFT must end immediately because if cases continued to be dealt with by the system, they could end up needing to be heard again, which would be a “very horrible waste of money”.

Issue: 7659 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll