header-logo header-logo

09 July 2015
Issue: 7660 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus , Profession
printer mail-detail

Austerity economics killing off civil legal aid

Osborne’s austerity experiment slated by leading legal aid proponent

This week’s budget will deliver further cuts to the remnants of our justice system and continue to “kill off” access to civil legal aid, according to legal aid campaigner Patrick Allen.

Writing in NLJ this week, Allen, senior partner at Hodge Jones & Allen pronounces the “Osborne austerity experiment” a failure, and decries the cuts to civil legal aid as a “stain” on our country at the very time when the government is “trumpeting the importance of Magna Carta”.

His views are backed up by figures published last week by the Ministry of Justice which show that the number of new matter starts has fallen year-on-year since April 2013, when the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 (LASPO) came into force (Legal Aid Statistics in England and Wales: January to March 2015). In the year 2012–13 the number of legal help matters started was 573,672, compared with 173,373 in 2013/14, the first full year post-LASPO. The figures for 2014–15 show only 170,617 matters started which means nearly 3,000 fewer people getting help.

Comparing the first quarter of this year with the same quarter prior to LASPO reveals an even starker difference—from 134,501 in 2012–13 to 43,307 for 2014–15.

Meanwhile, legal aid solicitors have continued their outstanding work, as evidenced by this year’s Laly’s (Legal Aid Lawyer of the Year awards). Marcia Willis-Stewart, managing partner of Birnberg Peirce, and solicitor for the family of Mark Duggan at the inquest into the 2011 police shooting, was named Public Law Solicitor of the year, while Public Law Project received the evening’s top award for Outstanding Achievement for its role in fighting the legal aid cuts with a series of successful judicial reviews.

Criminal Law Solicitors Association’s Bill Waddington and Robin Murray, and London Criminal Courts Solicitors Association’s Jonathan Black and Paul Harris were presented with a special award for their tireless campaigning against reforms to criminal legal aid.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Chief information officer appointment strengthens technology leadership

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Firm strengthens Wilmslow team with two solicitor appointments

DWF—Ian Plumley

DWF—Ian Plumley

Londoninsurance and reinsurance practice announces partner appointment

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll