header-logo header-logo

Austerity economics killing off civil legal aid

09 July 2015
Issue: 7660 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus , Profession
printer mail-detail

Osborne’s austerity experiment slated by leading legal aid proponent

This week’s budget will deliver further cuts to the remnants of our justice system and continue to “kill off” access to civil legal aid, according to legal aid campaigner Patrick Allen.

Writing in NLJ this week, Allen, senior partner at Hodge Jones & Allen pronounces the “Osborne austerity experiment” a failure, and decries the cuts to civil legal aid as a “stain” on our country at the very time when the government is “trumpeting the importance of Magna Carta”.

His views are backed up by figures published last week by the Ministry of Justice which show that the number of new matter starts has fallen year-on-year since April 2013, when the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 (LASPO) came into force (Legal Aid Statistics in England and Wales: January to March 2015). In the year 2012–13 the number of legal help matters started was 573,672, compared with 173,373 in 2013/14, the first full year post-LASPO. The figures for 2014–15 show only 170,617 matters started which means nearly 3,000 fewer people getting help.

Comparing the first quarter of this year with the same quarter prior to LASPO reveals an even starker difference—from 134,501 in 2012–13 to 43,307 for 2014–15.

Meanwhile, legal aid solicitors have continued their outstanding work, as evidenced by this year’s Laly’s (Legal Aid Lawyer of the Year awards). Marcia Willis-Stewart, managing partner of Birnberg Peirce, and solicitor for the family of Mark Duggan at the inquest into the 2011 police shooting, was named Public Law Solicitor of the year, while Public Law Project received the evening’s top award for Outstanding Achievement for its role in fighting the legal aid cuts with a series of successful judicial reviews.

Criminal Law Solicitors Association’s Bill Waddington and Robin Murray, and London Criminal Courts Solicitors Association’s Jonathan Black and Paul Harris were presented with a special award for their tireless campaigning against reforms to criminal legal aid.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll