header-logo header-logo

17 July 2015
Issue: 7661 / Categories: Legal News , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Back to the future: reforming human rights

European human rights law has created “an extra tier of litigation” and produced “problems, anomalies and even abuses”, a barrister has claimed.

Writing in NLJ this week, barrister and former reader at Southampton University Alec Samuels argues the case for reform. He suggests it is for the UK Parliament to determine the degree of infringement of personal liberty required to guarantee public safety in respect of control orders against suspected terrorist subjects, telephone tapping and other matters.

Samuels contends that that “unfair or unreasonable decisions in unmeritorious cases, particularly where criminals and illegal immigrants are concerned” has led members of the public to “become positively hostile, and this is a regrettable attitude to human rights.”

Issue: 7661 / Categories: Legal News , Human rights
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll