header-logo header-logo

Back to the future: reforming human rights

17 July 2015
Issue: 7661 / Categories: Legal News , Human rights
printer mail-detail

European human rights law has created “an extra tier of litigation” and produced “problems, anomalies and even abuses”, a barrister has claimed.

Writing in NLJ this week, barrister and former reader at Southampton University Alec Samuels argues the case for reform. He suggests it is for the UK Parliament to determine the degree of infringement of personal liberty required to guarantee public safety in respect of control orders against suspected terrorist subjects, telephone tapping and other matters.

Samuels contends that that “unfair or unreasonable decisions in unmeritorious cases, particularly where criminals and illegal immigrants are concerned” has led members of the public to “become positively hostile, and this is a regrettable attitude to human rights.”

Issue: 7661 / Categories: Legal News , Human rights
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

FOIL—Bridget Tatham

FOIL—Bridget Tatham

Forum of Insurance Lawyers elects president for 2026

Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair

Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair

Partner joinslabour and employment practice in London

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

NEWS
Cryptocurrency is reshaping financial remedy cases, warns Robert Webster of Maguire Family Law in NLJ this week. Digital assets—concealable, volatile and hard to trace—are fuelling suspicions of hidden wealth, yet Form E still lacks a section for crypto-disclosure
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold surveys a flurry of procedural reforms in his latest 'Civil way' column
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
back-to-top-scroll