header-logo header-logo

Backlash on whiplash

13 November 2014 / Dr Chris Pamplin
Issue: 7630 / Categories: Features , Expert Witness , Profession
printer mail-detail
pamplin

Chris Pamplin looks at recent moves by the Ministry of Justice to control the whiplash claims industry & MROs

The UK has long been dubbed the whiplash capital of the world, and both the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) and the insurance industry have increased their efforts to quell the number of fraudulent claims that are proving a drain on the court system, insurers and those who pay a high price for their motor insurance, at least that is the reason they say they are acting.

So far as experts are concerned, the issues that have come under scrutiny include the level of fees charged for medical reports on soft tissue injuries and the quality and independence, or otherwise, of those experts commissioned to provide them. The independence of experts in this field has also been questioned in relation to the work carried out by medico-legal reporting organisations (MROs) and their occasionally overly close connections with the solicitors who instruct them.

Of course, in these frugal times, the MoJ is unlikely to miss

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll