header-logo header-logo

The bailiff is not for hire

17 February 2017
Issue: 7734 / Categories: Case law , Judicial line , In Court
printer mail-detail

Is the court entitled to refuse a request for bailiff service of proceedings where the prescribed fee has been paid or there is an entitlement to fee remission?

In general, it is a matter for the court’s discretion and bailiff service will usually be declined if not requested by a litigant in person. The FPR at PD6A, para 11.4 expressly provide in relation to service of applications for matrimonial and civil partnership orders that a request will rarely be granted where the party is legally represented and that it will be necessary for the representative to show why service by bailiff is required rather than by process server. A similar approach to that applying in family business can be expected in civil business with the CPR not granting any specific right to bailiff service except for Pt 71 orders to attend court for questioning (see PD71, para 3). The fee for bailiff service is £110 unless the requesting party obtains remission (help with fees). Bailiff service is unsuccessful? The fee is lost.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
In NLJ this week, Bea Rossetto of the National Pro Bono Centre marks Pro Bono Week by urging lawyers to recognise the emotional toll of pro bono work
Can a lease legally last only days—or even hours? Professor Mark Pawlowski of the University of Greenwich explores the question in this week's NLJ
RFC Seraing v FIFA, in which the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) reaffirmed that awards by the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) may be reviewed by EU courts on public-policy grounds, is under examination in this week's NLJ by Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law, Zurich
back-to-top-scroll