header-logo header-logo

28 March 2017
Issue: 7740 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Bar Council criticises proposals to extend court sittings

The Bar Council has criticised government proposals for courts to start earlier and finish later. It said this would disadvantage barristers who have childcare responsibilities, especially women, due to the Cab-Rank rule.

The Ministry of Justice announced this week that it will pilot extra sittings at civil, Crown and magistrates’ courts to increase the number of cases they see each day, with the Crown court sitting until 6pm, civil courts until 7pm and magistrates’ courts until 8.30pm.

The Bar Council pointed out that, under the Cab-Rank rule, barristers must accept any appropriate instructions, but will not know until a case is listed whether it will be an early start or a late finish, and cannot withdraw from a case on the grounds that it clashes with childcare arrangements.

Andrew Langdon QC, Chairman of the Bar, said: “These arrangements will make it almost impossible for parents with childcare responsibilities to predict if they can make the school run or to know when they will be able to pick children up from the child-minders.  

“Childcare responsibilities still fall disproportionately to women, many of whom do not return to the profession after having children. It is hard to see how these plans sit with the government’s commitment to improving diversity in the profession and the judiciary.”

 

Issue: 7740 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll