header-logo header-logo

Bar Council criticises proposals to extend court sittings

28 March 2017
Issue: 7740 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

The Bar Council has criticised government proposals for courts to start earlier and finish later. It said this would disadvantage barristers who have childcare responsibilities, especially women, due to the Cab-Rank rule.

The Ministry of Justice announced this week that it will pilot extra sittings at civil, Crown and magistrates’ courts to increase the number of cases they see each day, with the Crown court sitting until 6pm, civil courts until 7pm and magistrates’ courts until 8.30pm.

The Bar Council pointed out that, under the Cab-Rank rule, barristers must accept any appropriate instructions, but will not know until a case is listed whether it will be an early start or a late finish, and cannot withdraw from a case on the grounds that it clashes with childcare arrangements.

Andrew Langdon QC, Chairman of the Bar, said: “These arrangements will make it almost impossible for parents with childcare responsibilities to predict if they can make the school run or to know when they will be able to pick children up from the child-minders.  

“Childcare responsibilities still fall disproportionately to women, many of whom do not return to the profession after having children. It is hard to see how these plans sit with the government’s commitment to improving diversity in the profession and the judiciary.”

 

Issue: 7740 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
Lawyers can no longer afford to ignore the metaverse, says Jacqueline Watts of Allin1 Advisory in this week's NLJ. Far from being a passing tech fad, virtual platforms like Roblox host thriving economies and social interactions, raising real legal issues
back-to-top-scroll