header-logo header-logo

10 February 2020
Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail

King’s College London announced as validating body for new ICCA Bar Course

 

The Dickson Poon School of Law at King’s College London has entered into an agreement with the Inns of Court College of Advocacy to act as the validating body for their new Bar Course.  This means that the first graduates of the ICCA Bar Course, who are expected to qualify in 2021, will receive a Postgraduate Diploma in Bar Practice from King's College London on their successful completion of the programme. The Office for Students has also officially registered the ICCA as a Higher Education Provider with the first course starting in September 2020.  

The first graduates of the Inns of Court College of Advocacy (ICCA) Bar Course are expected to qualify in 2021 with a Postgraduate Diploma in Bar Practice. The selection procedure for the first intake of students has already begun and the course is due to start in September.

The Bar Courses, which will be available at a number of universities, will replace the Bar Professional Training Course from September this year.

Part One of the course, which focuses on criminal and civil litigation, will be delivered entirely online and should take between 12-16 weeks to complete, Dickson Poon School said. Students will have access to interactive forums, online lessons and more than 30 films featuring real-life courtroom scenes.

Part Two, which will take 20-22 weeks to complete, will be delivered in person in the Inns of Court. It covers skills teaching, preparation for practice and advocacy classes.

Lynda Gibbs, Dean at the ICCA, said: ‘We are delighted to be announcing this academic partnership with King’s College London and that our students will receive their Bar qualification from this prestigious Russell Group university.

‘When we started to develop the ICCA Bar course, we set out to bring a completely fresh approach to Bar training and to deliver an innovative, high quality, flexible and affordable course providing students with a credible qualification to take them into pupillage and beyond.’  

Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
back-to-top-scroll