header-logo header-logo

15 July 2022
Issue: 7987 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail

Barrister psychometric tests to end

Divided opinions over fairness to students

The Bar Course Aptitude Test (BCAT) is to be scrapped from 31 July because it ‘no longer… serves a useful purpose’, the Bar Standards Board (BSB) has confirmed.

However, the Bar Council reiterated its concerns that scrapping the BCAT will lead to increasing numbers of students paying to complete courses with little or no prospect of achieving a successful career at the Bar.

The Legal Services Board has approved the BSB’s application to end the Test, which costs students £150 and was introduced as a prerequisite for vocational training as a barrister in 2013 when high numbers of students were failing the Bar course. The Test was intended to filter students for aptitude. It is a computerised 55-minute test with 60 multiple choice questions, based on a Watson-Glaser psychometric test of critical thinking and understanding of arguments, identifying different perspectives, and distinguishing facts from opinions and assumptions.

BSB director general, Mark Neale, said: ‘Bar training providers must comply fully with the requirements of the Authorisation Framework when selecting their students, and that includes their obligations to maintain high standards and to promote accessibility.

‘We shall continue to monitor providers carefully to ensure that their own selection of students is fair and rigorous.’

However, Mark Fenhalls QC, Chair of the Bar Council, said: ‘The problem of too many students wasting money embarking on courses they will struggle to pass is on the rise again.

‘We fully support the aims of making sure the Bar is accessible to people from all backgrounds and so we are disappointed that the decision to scrap the BCAT has been made without putting robust alternative provisions in place.’

In its response to the September 2021 BSB consultation on the future of the BCAT, the Bar Council highlighted the ‘reasonably good correlation between BCAT mark and degree of success on the BPTC’.

Issue: 7987 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
Litigators digesting Mazur are being urged to tighten oversight and compliance. In his latest 'Insider' column for NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School provides a cut out and keep guide to the ruling’s core test: whether an unauthorised individual is ‘in truth acting on behalf of the authorised individual’
Conflicting county court rulings have left landlords uncertain over whether they can force entry after tenants refuse access. In this week's NLJ, Edward Blakeney and Ashpen Rajah of Falcon Chambers outline a split: some judges permit it under CPR 70.2A, others insist only Parliament can authorise such powers
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
back-to-top-scroll