header-logo header-logo

Barrister psychometric tests to end

15 July 2022
Issue: 7987 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail

Divided opinions over fairness to students

The Bar Course Aptitude Test (BCAT) is to be scrapped from 31 July because it ‘no longer… serves a useful purpose’, the Bar Standards Board (BSB) has confirmed.

However, the Bar Council reiterated its concerns that scrapping the BCAT will lead to increasing numbers of students paying to complete courses with little or no prospect of achieving a successful career at the Bar.

The Legal Services Board has approved the BSB’s application to end the Test, which costs students £150 and was introduced as a prerequisite for vocational training as a barrister in 2013 when high numbers of students were failing the Bar course. The Test was intended to filter students for aptitude. It is a computerised 55-minute test with 60 multiple choice questions, based on a Watson-Glaser psychometric test of critical thinking and understanding of arguments, identifying different perspectives, and distinguishing facts from opinions and assumptions.

BSB director general, Mark Neale, said: ‘Bar training providers must comply fully with the requirements of the Authorisation Framework when selecting their students, and that includes their obligations to maintain high standards and to promote accessibility.

‘We shall continue to monitor providers carefully to ensure that their own selection of students is fair and rigorous.’

However, Mark Fenhalls QC, Chair of the Bar Council, said: ‘The problem of too many students wasting money embarking on courses they will struggle to pass is on the rise again.

‘We fully support the aims of making sure the Bar is accessible to people from all backgrounds and so we are disappointed that the decision to scrap the BCAT has been made without putting robust alternative provisions in place.’

In its response to the September 2021 BSB consultation on the future of the BCAT, the Bar Council highlighted the ‘reasonably good correlation between BCAT mark and degree of success on the BPTC’.

Issue: 7987 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kennedys—Samson Spanier

Kennedys—Samson Spanier

Commercial disputes practice bolstered by partner hire

Bird & Bird—Emma Radcliffe

Bird & Bird—Emma Radcliffe

London competition team expands with collective actions specialist hire

Hill Dickinson—Chris Williams

Hill Dickinson—Chris Williams

Commercial dispute resolution team in London welcomes partner

NEWS
Judging is ‘more intellectually demanding than any other role in public life’—and far messier than outsiders imagine. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC reflects on decades spent wrestling with unclear legislation, fragile precedent and human fallibility
The long-predicted death of the billable hour may finally be here—and this time, it’s armed with a scythe. In a sweeping critique of time-based billing, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, argues in this week's NLJ that artificial intelligence has made hourly charging ‘intellectually, commercially and ethically indefensible’
From fake authorities to rent reform, the civil courts have had a busy start to 2026. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold surveys a procedural landscape where guidance, discretion and discipline are all under strain
Fact-finding hearings remain a fault line in private family law. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Rylatt and Robyn Laye of Anthony Gold Solicitors analyse recent appeals exposing the dangers of rushed or fragmented findings
As the Winter Olympics open in Milan and Cortina, legal disputes are once again being resolved almost as fast as the athletes compete. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Ian Blackshaw of Valloni Attorneys examines the Court of Arbitration for Sport’s (CAS's) ad hoc divisions, which can decide cases within 24 hours
back-to-top-scroll