header-logo header-logo

Barristers begin no returns action

13 April 2022
Issue: 7975 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail
Criminal barristers have ploughed ahead with protest action, after the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) refused to increase fees and hourly rates by 25%

As of this week, they are adopting a policy of ‘no returns’―refusing to provide cover on cases ‘returned’ due to diary clashes―in line with a Criminal Bar Association (CBA) ballot in February in which 94% of members voted to withdraw their goodwill by no longer accepting return work. The CBA says the number of criminal barristers has shrunk by a quarter in the past five years and warns hundreds more criminal barristers will leave the profession because they don’t find the work financially viable.

The MoJ offered a 15% increase in advocacy fees, the minimum recommended by Sir Christopher Bellamy’s Independent Review into Criminal Legal Aid and the rise would not take place until October.

There was a backlog of more than 39,000 Crown Court cases before pandemic restrictions came into force (this has increased to about 60,000). According to the CBA, 280 trials in the last quarter of 2021 were adjourned due to shortages of barristers, and cases now take an average of 700 days to complete.

The CBA says criminal barristers earn a median £12,200 per year after expenses in their first three years, and income after expenses from legal aid fees for all specialist criminal barristers fell by 23% in a single year (2019/20-2020/21) to an average of £47,000 (see here).

CBA chair Jo Sidhu QC said: ‘Criminal barristers can no longer afford to wait and, with every passing week, increasing numbers are leaving our ranks to find alternative work that offers a viable career.

‘Without sufficient prosecutors and defenders, thousands of victims and accused will continue to face years of delay and the backlog in cases will grow ever longer.’

Meanwhile, Bar Council research published this week has uncovered a ten per cent attrition rate at the Criminal Bar during the pandemic (from 2,670 in 2019-20 to 2,400 in 2020-21).

The data, drawn from 3,730 barristers who earned some fee income from publicly funded criminal work in 2020-21, was not considered by Sir Christopher Bellamy’s Independent Review into Criminal Legal Aid (see here).
Issue: 7975 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll