header-logo header-logo

Barristers begin no returns action

13 April 2022
Issue: 7975 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail
Criminal barristers have ploughed ahead with protest action, after the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) refused to increase fees and hourly rates by 25%

As of this week, they are adopting a policy of ‘no returns’―refusing to provide cover on cases ‘returned’ due to diary clashes―in line with a Criminal Bar Association (CBA) ballot in February in which 94% of members voted to withdraw their goodwill by no longer accepting return work. The CBA says the number of criminal barristers has shrunk by a quarter in the past five years and warns hundreds more criminal barristers will leave the profession because they don’t find the work financially viable.

The MoJ offered a 15% increase in advocacy fees, the minimum recommended by Sir Christopher Bellamy’s Independent Review into Criminal Legal Aid and the rise would not take place until October.

There was a backlog of more than 39,000 Crown Court cases before pandemic restrictions came into force (this has increased to about 60,000). According to the CBA, 280 trials in the last quarter of 2021 were adjourned due to shortages of barristers, and cases now take an average of 700 days to complete.

The CBA says criminal barristers earn a median £12,200 per year after expenses in their first three years, and income after expenses from legal aid fees for all specialist criminal barristers fell by 23% in a single year (2019/20-2020/21) to an average of £47,000 (see here).

CBA chair Jo Sidhu QC said: ‘Criminal barristers can no longer afford to wait and, with every passing week, increasing numbers are leaving our ranks to find alternative work that offers a viable career.

‘Without sufficient prosecutors and defenders, thousands of victims and accused will continue to face years of delay and the backlog in cases will grow ever longer.’

Meanwhile, Bar Council research published this week has uncovered a ten per cent attrition rate at the Criminal Bar during the pandemic (from 2,670 in 2019-20 to 2,400 in 2020-21).

The data, drawn from 3,730 barristers who earned some fee income from publicly funded criminal work in 2020-21, was not considered by Sir Christopher Bellamy’s Independent Review into Criminal Legal Aid (see here).
Issue: 7975 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll