header-logo header-logo

Barristers threaten action to protest CPS fees

23 April 2019
Categories: Legal News , Profession , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Nearly 95% of criminal barristers who prosecute cases would be prepared to take direct action in protest against the fees paid by the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS).

Responding to a Criminal Bar Association (CBA) survey, published this week, 1,870 barristers said they would take days of action and adopt a no returns policy if all other routes to reform were exhausted.

More than 2,000 barristers took part in the survey, and the overwhelming majority complained they are overburdened and underpaid. 99.3% said ‘no’, when asked if they felt current rates for prosecution advocacy reflect the demands, skills and responsibilities involved.

Nearly 85% do not feel valued by the CPS, and similar numbers said the amount of work expected has increased in the past five years, including the amount of time spent on materials that are then not used.

Moreover, 98% agreed counsel should be paid a refresher fee for the second day in all cases; 93% thought an additional fee should be paid for written work, and 94% thought they should be paid for reviewing unused material.

Current rates have not increased since the CPS advocacy scheme launched in 2001―and fees were cut by 5% in 2012.

CBA chair Chris Henley QC said it was ‘beyond ridiculous’ that a barrister could spend a whole day in court presenting a serious criminal case for £46.50.

Richard Atkins QC, chair of the Bar Council, said: ‘One of my priorities for 2019 is to ensure that those members of the Bar who do publicly funded work, are fairly and properly remunerated.

‘The many barristers who are instructed by the CPS perform a vital public function, without whom the system of justice in this country would not operate.’

Last year, the CBA negotiated fee increases of £23m for defence work after protests by criminal barristers. 

Categories: Legal News , Profession , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Browne Jacobson—Matthew Kemp

Browne Jacobson—Matthew Kemp

Firm grows real estate team with tenth partner hire this financial year

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

NEWS
Early determination is no longer a novelty in arbitration. In NLJ this week, Gustavo Moser, arbitration specialist lawyer at Lexis+, charts the global embrace of summary disposal powers, now embedded in the Arbitration Act 1996 and mirrored worldwide. Tribunals may swiftly dismiss claims with ‘no real prospect of succeeding’, but only if fairness is preserved
The Ministry of Justice is once again in the dock as access to justice continues to deteriorate. NLJ consultant editor David Greene warns in this week's issue that neither public legal aid nor private litigation funding looks set for a revival in 2026
Civil justice lurches onward with characteristic eccentricity. In his latest Civil Way column, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist, surveys a procedural landscape featuring 19-page bundle rules, digital possession claims, and rent laws he labels ‘bonkers’
Can a chief constable be held responsible for disobedient officers? Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth, professor of public law at De Montfort University, examines a Court of Appeal ruling that answers firmly: yes
Neurotechnology is poised to transform contract law—and unsettle it. Writing in NLJ this week, Harry Lambert, barrister at Outer Temple Chambers and founder of the Centre for Neurotechnology & Law, and Dr Michelle Sharpe, barrister at the Victorian Bar, explore how brain–computer interfaces could both prove and undermine consent
back-to-top-scroll