header-logo header-logo

23 April 2019
Categories: Legal News , Profession , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Barristers threaten action to protest CPS fees

Nearly 95% of criminal barristers who prosecute cases would be prepared to take direct action in protest against the fees paid by the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS).

Responding to a Criminal Bar Association (CBA) survey, published this week, 1,870 barristers said they would take days of action and adopt a no returns policy if all other routes to reform were exhausted.

More than 2,000 barristers took part in the survey, and the overwhelming majority complained they are overburdened and underpaid. 99.3% said ‘no’, when asked if they felt current rates for prosecution advocacy reflect the demands, skills and responsibilities involved.

Nearly 85% do not feel valued by the CPS, and similar numbers said the amount of work expected has increased in the past five years, including the amount of time spent on materials that are then not used.

Moreover, 98% agreed counsel should be paid a refresher fee for the second day in all cases; 93% thought an additional fee should be paid for written work, and 94% thought they should be paid for reviewing unused material.

Current rates have not increased since the CPS advocacy scheme launched in 2001―and fees were cut by 5% in 2012.

CBA chair Chris Henley QC said it was ‘beyond ridiculous’ that a barrister could spend a whole day in court presenting a serious criminal case for £46.50.

Richard Atkins QC, chair of the Bar Council, said: ‘One of my priorities for 2019 is to ensure that those members of the Bar who do publicly funded work, are fairly and properly remunerated.

‘The many barristers who are instructed by the CPS perform a vital public function, without whom the system of justice in this country would not operate.’

Last year, the CBA negotiated fee increases of £23m for defence work after protests by criminal barristers. 

Categories: Legal News , Profession , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Projects and rail practices strengthened by director hire in London

DWF—Stephen Hickling

DWF—Stephen Hickling

Real estate team in Birmingham welcomes back returning partner

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Firm invests in national growth with 44 appointments across five offices

NEWS
The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 transformed criminal justice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ed Cape of UWE and Matthew Hardcastle and Sandra Paul of Kingsley Napley trace its ‘seismic impact’
Operational resilience is no longer optional. Writing in NLJ this week, Emma Radmore and Michael Lewis of Womble Bond Dickinson explain how UK regulators expect firms to identify ‘important business services’ that could cause ‘intolerable levels of harm’ if disrupted
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
back-to-top-scroll