header-logo header-logo

23 April 2019
Categories: Legal News , Profession , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Barristers threaten action to protest CPS fees

Nearly 95% of criminal barristers who prosecute cases would be prepared to take direct action in protest against the fees paid by the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS).

Responding to a Criminal Bar Association (CBA) survey, published this week, 1,870 barristers said they would take days of action and adopt a no returns policy if all other routes to reform were exhausted.

More than 2,000 barristers took part in the survey, and the overwhelming majority complained they are overburdened and underpaid. 99.3% said ‘no’, when asked if they felt current rates for prosecution advocacy reflect the demands, skills and responsibilities involved.

Nearly 85% do not feel valued by the CPS, and similar numbers said the amount of work expected has increased in the past five years, including the amount of time spent on materials that are then not used.

Moreover, 98% agreed counsel should be paid a refresher fee for the second day in all cases; 93% thought an additional fee should be paid for written work, and 94% thought they should be paid for reviewing unused material.

Current rates have not increased since the CPS advocacy scheme launched in 2001―and fees were cut by 5% in 2012.

CBA chair Chris Henley QC said it was ‘beyond ridiculous’ that a barrister could spend a whole day in court presenting a serious criminal case for £46.50.

Richard Atkins QC, chair of the Bar Council, said: ‘One of my priorities for 2019 is to ensure that those members of the Bar who do publicly funded work, are fairly and properly remunerated.

‘The many barristers who are instructed by the CPS perform a vital public function, without whom the system of justice in this country would not operate.’

Last year, the CBA negotiated fee increases of £23m for defence work after protests by criminal barristers. 

Categories: Legal News , Profession , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Construction team bolstered by hire of senior consultant duo

Switalskis—four appointments

Switalskis—four appointments

Firm expands residential conveyancing team with quadruple appointment

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

Private client team welcomes senior associatein Worcester

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll