header-logo header-logo

27 May 2019
Issue: 7842 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Barristers vote on walkout

Criminal barristers are voting on whether to stage a ‘whole profession walkout’ on 1 July over prosecution and defence fees

After 1 July, barristers would operate an indefinite no returns policy for both defence and prosecution work. The Criminal Bar Association (CBA), which balloted its members last week on the proposed action, also promised ‘action will escalate in due course’ if there is no progress on barristers’ demands.

Barristers have until 5pm on 4 June to voice their opinion. However, some 95% of criminal barristers surveyed by the CBA last month said they were prepared to take direct action.

In a message to members, CBA chair Chris Henley QC and vice-chair Caroline Goodwin QC said: ‘We are paid less than the minimum wage in case after case, whether prosecuting or defending.

‘We work late into the night, and through weekends as a matter of routine. We gift huge numbers of hours, worth ten, twenty, thirty thousand pounds a year, if not more, to keep trials on track, and on time.

‘This is not proposed

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
back-to-top-scroll