header-logo header-logo

27 May 2019
Issue: 7842 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Barristers vote on walkout

Criminal barristers are voting on whether to stage a ‘whole profession walkout’ on 1 July over prosecution and defence fees

After 1 July, barristers would operate an indefinite no returns policy for both defence and prosecution work. The Criminal Bar Association (CBA), which balloted its members last week on the proposed action, also promised ‘action will escalate in due course’ if there is no progress on barristers’ demands.

Barristers have until 5pm on 4 June to voice their opinion. However, some 95% of criminal barristers surveyed by the CBA last month said they were prepared to take direct action.

In a message to members, CBA chair Chris Henley QC and vice-chair Caroline Goodwin QC said: ‘We are paid less than the minimum wage in case after case, whether prosecuting or defending.

‘We work late into the night, and through weekends as a matter of routine. We gift huge numbers of hours, worth ten, twenty, thirty thousand pounds a year, if not more, to keep trials on track, and on time.

‘This is not proposed

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Michelman Robinson—Daniel Burbeary

Michelman Robinson—Daniel Burbeary

Firm names partner as London office managing partner

Bellevue Law—Sally Hall

Bellevue Law—Sally Hall

Employment boutique strengthens data protection and privacy offering with senior consultant hire

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

NEWS
Personal injury lawyers have welcomed a government U-turn on a ‘substantial prejudice’ defence that risked enabling defendants in child sexual abuse civil cases to have proceedings against them dropped
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
back-to-top-scroll