header-logo header-logo

Barristers vote on walkout

27 May 2019
Issue: 7842 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Criminal
printer mail-detail
Criminal barristers are voting on whether to stage a ‘whole profession walkout’ on 1 July over prosecution and defence fees

After 1 July, barristers would operate an indefinite no returns policy for both defence and prosecution work. The Criminal Bar Association (CBA), which balloted its members last week on the proposed action, also promised ‘action will escalate in due course’ if there is no progress on barristers’ demands.

Barristers have until 5pm on 4 June to voice their opinion. However, some 95% of criminal barristers surveyed by the CBA last month said they were prepared to take direct action.

In a message to members, CBA chair Chris Henley QC and vice-chair Caroline Goodwin QC said: ‘We are paid less than the minimum wage in case after case, whether prosecuting or defending.

‘We work late into the night, and through weekends as a matter of routine. We gift huge numbers of hours, worth ten, twenty, thirty thousand pounds a year, if not more, to keep trials on track, and on time.

‘This is not proposed

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll