header-logo header-logo

Beam me up Scotty

05 October 2012 / Ray Purdy
Issue: 7532 / Categories: Features , Technology
printer mail-detail

Ray Purdy investigates the potential legal impact of revolutionary new “beaming” technologies

Technology often runs ahead of legislation, but major advances in what is known as “remote presence” could soon pose challenges to conventional legal systems. A major European Commission project called “Beaming”, named after the teleportation device in the TV series Star Trek, is developing a groundbreaking new remote presence technology that can enable people to “travel” instantaneously to locations elsewhere (see http://beaming-eu.org/). This will allow individuals’ bodies to appear in one or more locations, other than where they are physically present, and to participate in physical exchanges at those locations. While this could revolutionise the way the public uses the internet to travel and interact, aspects of its use could be controversial and raise legal questions that have not been considered before.

The technology

Beaming uses a variety of technologies to influence human senses and emotional states, so users become fully immersed in a new environment and think they are “really there” in another place. However, it differs

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll