header-logo header-logo

Beam me up Scotty

05 October 2012 / Ray Purdy
Issue: 7532 / Categories: Features , Technology
printer mail-detail

Ray Purdy investigates the potential legal impact of revolutionary new “beaming” technologies

Technology often runs ahead of legislation, but major advances in what is known as “remote presence” could soon pose challenges to conventional legal systems. A major European Commission project called “Beaming”, named after the teleportation device in the TV series Star Trek, is developing a groundbreaking new remote presence technology that can enable people to “travel” instantaneously to locations elsewhere (see http://beaming-eu.org/). This will allow individuals’ bodies to appear in one or more locations, other than where they are physically present, and to participate in physical exchanges at those locations. While this could revolutionise the way the public uses the internet to travel and interact, aspects of its use could be controversial and raise legal questions that have not been considered before.

The technology

Beaming uses a variety of technologies to influence human senses and emotional states, so users become fully immersed in a new environment and think they are “really there” in another place. However, it differs

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll