header-logo header-logo

30 July 2010 / Keith Patten
Issue: 7428 / Categories: Features , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Bearing the burden

Keith Patten applauds the judiciary’s common-sense approach to evidence in personal injury claims

It is trite law that a claimant in a personal injury claim bears the burden of proof on most important issues, including those of duty, breach, damage and causation. This burden carries with it an obligation on the part of the claimant to adduce evidence from which the court can be convinced (on a balance of probabilities, of course) that the case he is advancing has been made out. As a general proposition, therefore, if evidence is simply not available then that is likely to represent a problem for the claimant rather more than for the defendant. That basic statement of principle can, however, be subject to a more nuanced approach in some cases. What, for example, of the position where the non-availability of evidence is, of itself, a consequence of the defendant’s breach of duty. That was an issue which the Court of Appeal needed to address in Keefe v The Isle of Man Steam Packet Company Limited [2010] EWCA Civ

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll