header-logo header-logo

13 January 2011 / Costa Kypre , Daniel Kavan
Issue: 7448 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

Beating the system

Review systems with a mind of their own? Costa Kypre & Daniel Kavan report

The exponential growth in the volume of electronic documents has prompted increased demand for more sophisticated tools and technologies to assist in tackling a review exercise. Even a fairly modest exercise involving the documentation for one or two individuals could easily involve sifting through tens of thousands of documents. Suppliers of these tools and technologies operate in a highly competitive and demanding environment, which encourages them to invest in innovation.

Typically these advances in technology have focused on tools to assist with the analysis and sorting of a data set into a more structured and easy to review format. Examples of these include advanced visual analytics, so a user can quickly ascertain who has been speaking to whom; and topic grouping, which allows a user to sort documents into relevant silos, so that a reviewer can tackle one subject matter at a time. Recent developments in legal technologies have focused on how technology can be utilised to take some

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

DWF—11 appointments

DWF—11 appointments

DWF strengthens North West teams with 11 newly qualified solicitors

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll