header-logo header-logo

13 January 2011 / Costa Kypre , Daniel Kavan
Issue: 7448 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

Beating the system

Review systems with a mind of their own? Costa Kypre & Daniel Kavan report

The exponential growth in the volume of electronic documents has prompted increased demand for more sophisticated tools and technologies to assist in tackling a review exercise. Even a fairly modest exercise involving the documentation for one or two individuals could easily involve sifting through tens of thousands of documents. Suppliers of these tools and technologies operate in a highly competitive and demanding environment, which encourages them to invest in innovation.

Typically these advances in technology have focused on tools to assist with the analysis and sorting of a data set into a more structured and easy to review format. Examples of these include advanced visual analytics, so a user can quickly ascertain who has been speaking to whom; and topic grouping, which allows a user to sort documents into relevant silos, so that a reviewer can tackle one subject matter at a time. Recent developments in legal technologies have focused on how technology can be utilised to take some

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll