header-logo header-logo

Beer war comes to a head

28 September 2011
Issue: 7483 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Two drinks giants must share a trademark in the UK, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) has ruled

Anheuser-Busch, which makes US Budweiser beer, has lost its attempt to legally force its Czech rival Budějovický Budvar to stop using the “Budweiser” name in the UK.

In 2000, both companies were given permission by the Court of Appeal to simultaneously register the trademark as they had a long-standing and honest history of co-existence in the UK market.

That changed in 2005, when Anheuser-Busch started legal action to invalidate their rival’s use of the trademark on the grounds that their 1976 registration predates Budvar’s 1989 application. The Court of Appeal sought clarification from the ECJ, which last week ruled in Budvar’s favour.

Mark Blair, partner at Marks & Clerk Solicitors, which acted for Budvar, said: “The two brands have co-existed in the UK for decades, differing in taste, price, and get up.

“The identical nature of the ‘Budweiser’ marks is an honest, historical co-incidence, and causes no significant confusion amongst UK consumers.This is effectively a very strong endorsement from the [ECJ] of Budvar’s right to the ‘Budweiser’ name in the UK, and of the underlying principles of trademark law in general—it sends a clear message that you cannot simply cancel a trademark that has been used for 30 plus years in good faith.”

Issue: 7483 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
back-to-top-scroll