header-logo header-logo

20 May 2014 / Richard Lane , Richard Lane
Issue: 7608 / Categories: Opinion
printer mail-detail

Being the best

web_lane

Creating a LGB-friendly workplace is essential for a business to thrive, says Richard Lane

Being authentic is a key attribute shared by successful people. In law, as in any other sector of employment, this holds true; not only do authentic people achieve their targets, they inspire confidence around them and act as role models to their peers.

However if you are lesbian, gay or bisexual (LGB), being authentic may be more challenging if you’re working in the legal sector. From the outside looking in, the profession can be mystifying, tied up with tradition, and only welcoming to those who fit a narrow stereotype. And being LGB certainly doesn’t fit it. It’s hard to be authentic if you feel unable to talk about your partner, or where you went at the weekend. If homophobic comments are passed off as banter in the office and go unchallenged, then the likelihood that someone can be LGB and authentic will be even lower. In the war for talent and the need to secure the best performance from

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll