header-logo header-logo

04 December 2020
Issue: 7914 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Covid-19
printer mail-detail

Bellwether: confidence beginning to return

Small and medium law firms are regaining their confidence as the impact of COVID-19 begins to ease, but one in four are making cuts and 40% are changing their practice area base, according to the latest 2020 Bellwether Report

The report, ‘COVID-19: the next chapter’, by LexisNexis, is the second Bellwether to study the impact of the pandemic. The survey was conducted with 120 lawyers at firms with fewer than 21 fee-earners. It found that, six months on from the first lockdown, the worst effects have started to lessen and four out of five firms now believe they will be in business for the long term.

However, 23% are implementing cuts, compared to only 4% during the first lockdown.

Brexit and regulatory compliance continue to weigh heavily on lawyers’ minds. However, nearly half the respondents said Covid was their biggest worry (down from 63% in the previous 2020 Bellwether) and, with home working now the norm, 58% said staff welfare was their biggest concern.

The move to home working has been largely successful. However, it has led to feelings of isolation and a lack of motivation for three out of four lawyers. Despite this, more than two-thirds of the lawyers surveyed believed their work quality had improved or stayed the same.

One of the challenges of home working is lack of communication or miscommunication. Only one quarter saw this as a problem back in March, when home working was just getting underway. In this second survey, however, this number had risen to 44%, suggesting it is an urgent business problem for firms. 

The report found: ‘Lack of management direction and supervision were also considered to be increasing issues since the first lockdown.

‘Young lawyers, in particular, who perhaps typically rely on colleagues for morale and training, said they were feeling increasingly isolated as the crisis has deepened.’

Some 40% of firms were changing their practice base to become either more generalist or more specialist, with the majority of these choosing to specialise.

Marin Daley, small law lead at LexisNexis, said: ‘Law firms have worked exceptionally hard over the last six months to continue practicing and supporting their clients. The relief and positivism in this latest Bellwether is notable. However, it is clear that with one problem receding, the future is still uncertain.’

View the full Bellwether report at: www.lexisnexis.co.uk/Bellwether2020.

Issue: 7914 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Covid-19
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Investigations and corporate crime expert joins as partner

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Veteran funds specialist joins investment funds team

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Firm enhances competition practice with London partner hire

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll