header-logo header-logo

04 December 2020
Issue: 7914 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Covid-19
printer mail-detail

Bellwether: confidence beginning to return

Small and medium law firms are regaining their confidence as the impact of COVID-19 begins to ease, but one in four are making cuts and 40% are changing their practice area base, according to the latest 2020 Bellwether Report

The report, ‘COVID-19: the next chapter’, by LexisNexis, is the second Bellwether to study the impact of the pandemic. The survey was conducted with 120 lawyers at firms with fewer than 21 fee-earners. It found that, six months on from the first lockdown, the worst effects have started to lessen and four out of five firms now believe they will be in business for the long term.

However, 23% are implementing cuts, compared to only 4% during the first lockdown.

Brexit and regulatory compliance continue to weigh heavily on lawyers’ minds. However, nearly half the respondents said Covid was their biggest worry (down from 63% in the previous 2020 Bellwether) and, with home working now the norm, 58% said staff welfare was their biggest concern.

The move to home working has been largely successful. However, it has led to feelings of isolation and a lack of motivation for three out of four lawyers. Despite this, more than two-thirds of the lawyers surveyed believed their work quality had improved or stayed the same.

One of the challenges of home working is lack of communication or miscommunication. Only one quarter saw this as a problem back in March, when home working was just getting underway. In this second survey, however, this number had risen to 44%, suggesting it is an urgent business problem for firms. 

The report found: ‘Lack of management direction and supervision were also considered to be increasing issues since the first lockdown.

‘Young lawyers, in particular, who perhaps typically rely on colleagues for morale and training, said they were feeling increasingly isolated as the crisis has deepened.’

Some 40% of firms were changing their practice base to become either more generalist or more specialist, with the majority of these choosing to specialise.

Marin Daley, small law lead at LexisNexis, said: ‘Law firms have worked exceptionally hard over the last six months to continue practicing and supporting their clients. The relief and positivism in this latest Bellwether is notable. However, it is clear that with one problem receding, the future is still uncertain.’

View the full Bellwether report at: www.lexisnexis.co.uk/Bellwether2020.

Issue: 7914 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Covid-19
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Projects and rail practices strengthened by director hire in London

Bird & Bird—Gordon Moir

Bird & Bird—Gordon Moir

London tech and comms team boosted by telecoms and regulatory hires

DWF—Stephen Hickling

DWF—Stephen Hickling

Real estate team in Birmingham welcomes back returning partner

NEWS
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
Employment law is shifting at the margins. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ this week, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School examines a Court of Appeal ruling confirming that volunteers are not a special legal species and may qualify as ‘workers’
Refusing ADR is risky—but not always fatal. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed and Sanjay Dave Singh of the University of Leicester analyse Assensus Ltd v Wirsol Energy Ltd: despite repeated invitations to mediate, the defendant stood firm, made a £100,000 Part 36 offer and was ultimately ‘wholly vindicated’ at trial
back-to-top-scroll