header-logo header-logo

Bellwether: confidence beginning to return

04 December 2020
Issue: 7914 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Covid-19
printer mail-detail
Small and medium law firms are regaining their confidence as the impact of COVID-19 begins to ease, but one in four are making cuts and 40% are changing their practice area base, according to the latest 2020 Bellwether Report

The report, ‘COVID-19: the next chapter’, by LexisNexis, is the second Bellwether to study the impact of the pandemic. The survey was conducted with 120 lawyers at firms with fewer than 21 fee-earners. It found that, six months on from the first lockdown, the worst effects have started to lessen and four out of five firms now believe they will be in business for the long term.

However, 23% are implementing cuts, compared to only 4% during the first lockdown.

Brexit and regulatory compliance continue to weigh heavily on lawyers’ minds. However, nearly half the respondents said Covid was their biggest worry (down from 63% in the previous 2020 Bellwether) and, with home working now the norm, 58% said staff welfare was their biggest concern.

The move to home working has been largely successful. However, it has led to feelings of isolation and a lack of motivation for three out of four lawyers. Despite this, more than two-thirds of the lawyers surveyed believed their work quality had improved or stayed the same.

One of the challenges of home working is lack of communication or miscommunication. Only one quarter saw this as a problem back in March, when home working was just getting underway. In this second survey, however, this number had risen to 44%, suggesting it is an urgent business problem for firms. 

The report found: ‘Lack of management direction and supervision were also considered to be increasing issues since the first lockdown.

‘Young lawyers, in particular, who perhaps typically rely on colleagues for morale and training, said they were feeling increasingly isolated as the crisis has deepened.’

Some 40% of firms were changing their practice base to become either more generalist or more specialist, with the majority of these choosing to specialise.

Marin Daley, small law lead at LexisNexis, said: ‘Law firms have worked exceptionally hard over the last six months to continue practicing and supporting their clients. The relief and positivism in this latest Bellwether is notable. However, it is clear that with one problem receding, the future is still uncertain.’

View the full Bellwether report at: www.lexisnexis.co.uk/Bellwether2020.

Issue: 7914 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Covid-19
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll