header-logo header-logo

Bellwether finds confidence & optimism

28 July 2020
Issue: 7897 / Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Profession
printer mail-detail
Small and medium law firms are bullish about the future but, paradoxically, far less confident about their clients’ prospects, according to this year’s Bellwether Report
The annual update, commissioned by LexisNexis and published this week, found 84% of firms are stable or growing and more than two-thirds of firms are planning for growth in the next five years―yet 38% view COVID-19 as a critical threat for their clients. As the report states, ‘there is no path to recovery without a buoyant consumer and commercial market’.


The findings indicate law firms may be in a healthier state than many thought―a Law Society survey published on 1 May, by comparison, found 71% of high street firms believed they might have to close their business in the next six months.  

‘This is a starkly different picture compared to other surveys of the legal market,’ the report states.

‘Our fieldwork, conducted a month or two later, may reflect the impact of the government’s rescue plan in shoring up legal firm’s finances.’

Nearly eight in ten firms are making use of a rescue initiative, such as the furlough scheme. Surprisingly, only 4% of firms needed to make any redundancies and only 17% believe they may need to when the furlough scheme ends in October.

The option of working from home is likely to continue when the pandemic ends. Of those surveyed, half thought their firm was likely to permanently change its policy, and 53% said they would like to work from home full- or part-time in the future. However, there have also been drawbacks, with the biggest issue, cited by 71% of respondents, being the lack of face-to-face contact with clients.

Chris O’Connor, Small Law lead at LexisNexis, said: ‘The COVID-19 crisis has been tough for the legal sector, but there are positive signs in the darkness. 

‘With high growth predictions, improved wellbeing and an uptake of new technologies―law firms have a lot to look forward to. But, with commercial and consumer market-places stuttering―much rides on a sharp recovery.’

The report, ‘OMG or BAU? Bellwether 2020: COVID-19 and the legal industry’, can be downloaded from: www.lexisnexis.co.uk/Bellwether2020.

 

Issue: 7897 / Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll