header-logo header-logo

11 September 2019
Issue: 7855 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Legal services
printer mail-detail

Bellwether finds skills mismatch

Many solicitors overlooking importance of business acumen

Solicitors have a ‘blind spot’ when it comes to recognising the skills required for success, the latest Bellwether report has found.

Nine out of ten solicitors surveyed agreed with the statement that good business and human skills are important to success. This result, however, was very much at odds with the responses received when the researchers delved further, asking solicitors to arrange 22 different skills in order of priority. According to the report, launched this week, the respondents valued legal skills highest, followed by human skills, and viewed business skills as less important.

Four out of five of the skills ranked by respondents as top priorities for success were human skills, including common sense (89%), inspires trust (87%), willingness to listen (84%) and speaks plainly without jargon (81%). The number one priority (91%) was the ability to identify the real problem and decipher what the client really wants.

By comparison, only 48% of respondents saw the ability to generate business as a vital skill, a mere 40% thought service industry skills important and a relatively scant 35% viewed entrepreneurial skills as a priority.

The report, ‘The Good Solicitor’s Skill Set’, is based on data from eight in-depth interviews with solicitors in small firms and small offices of larger firms, as well as online surveys completed by 176 solicitors across England and Wales. Its author, Jon Whittle, market development director at LexisNexis UK, said: ‘There’s a noticeable blind spot with regards to skills among solicitors.

‘They understand, in the abstract, what is needed to be successful, but they are blind to their own failings and are potentially even reluctant to make adjustments in the way they approach legal service provision. With the legal market opening up to non-law firms and the changes in the Solicitors Regulation Authority Handbook in November this year, resolutely closing the skills gap needs to become a priority for solicitors.’

Issue: 7855 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Legal services
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Projects and rail practices strengthened by director hire in London

DWF—Stephen Hickling

DWF—Stephen Hickling

Real estate team in Birmingham welcomes back returning partner

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Firm invests in national growth with 44 appointments across five offices

NEWS
The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 transformed criminal justice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ed Cape of UWE and Matthew Hardcastle and Sandra Paul of Kingsley Napley trace its ‘seismic impact’
Operational resilience is no longer optional. Writing in NLJ this week, Emma Radmore and Michael Lewis of Womble Bond Dickinson explain how UK regulators expect firms to identify ‘important business services’ that could cause ‘intolerable levels of harm’ if disrupted
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
back-to-top-scroll