header-logo header-logo

06 February 2019
Issue: 7827 / Categories: Legal News , Legal services , Profession
printer mail-detail

Bellwether highlights risks of pricing transparency

Service, speed & efficiency must take precedence over price

Many solicitors at small and independent firms reject regulators’ push for pricing transparency and believe cost-focused behaviour by clients will undermine their professional integrity, according to the latest Bellwether Research paper.

Some 71% of respondents said their work is compromised by ‘client demands and their consumerist behaviours’, while 58% believe that price-driven clients are impacting on the ability of lawyers to uphold the integrity of the law and provide the best service to clients.

When asked why they thought consumerist behaviour risks affecting professional integrity, 26% cited ‘reducing costs at expense of quality’, 5% said ‘client doesn’t realise skills dropping’ and 3% said ‘encourages unethical practices’. 

The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) introduced new price transparency rules on certain services in December 2018. However, only 29% of solicitors polled are happy to publish prices and 32% reject the move. Only one in ten believes that transparency is a force for good.

One reason for this response is that clients often fail to understand the value of a service or the complexity of the work involved.

In one case, for example, a client asked how much it would cost to write their own letter but send it on the firm’s headed notepaper—the request was refused. Another client, according to Karen Purdy, director at Purdys Solicitors, ‘said of the cost of wills including a complex trust, “but it’s just words”! It is our job to explain how that piece of paper benefits that client and their family’.

More than 200 lawyers at small and independent firms across England and Wales were surveyed for the research, ‘The Changing Face of Law’, along with 12 in-depth interviews, published by LexisNexis this week. 

Jon Whittle, market development director at LexisNexis UK, said: ‘The internet has encouraged consumers of almost all products and services to be able to make quick and easy comparisons between providers and price is the easiest common denominator.

‘Most solicitors we surveyed believe that outcomes are the most important factor for clients when it comes to judging value for money. Service, speed, and efficiency follow, with price falling last.’

Issue: 7827 / Categories: Legal News , Legal services , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll