header-logo header-logo

06 February 2019
Issue: 7827 / Categories: Legal News , Legal services , Profession
printer mail-detail

Bellwether highlights risks of pricing transparency

Service, speed & efficiency must take precedence over price

Many solicitors at small and independent firms reject regulators’ push for pricing transparency and believe cost-focused behaviour by clients will undermine their professional integrity, according to the latest Bellwether Research paper.

Some 71% of respondents said their work is compromised by ‘client demands and their consumerist behaviours’, while 58% believe that price-driven clients are impacting on the ability of lawyers to uphold the integrity of the law and provide the best service to clients.

When asked why they thought consumerist behaviour risks affecting professional integrity, 26% cited ‘reducing costs at expense of quality’, 5% said ‘client doesn’t realise skills dropping’ and 3% said ‘encourages unethical practices’. 

The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) introduced new price transparency rules on certain services in December 2018. However, only 29% of solicitors polled are happy to publish prices and 32% reject the move. Only one in ten believes that transparency is a force for good.

One reason for this response is that clients often fail to understand the value of a service or the complexity of the work involved.

In one case, for example, a client asked how much it would cost to write their own letter but send it on the firm’s headed notepaper—the request was refused. Another client, according to Karen Purdy, director at Purdys Solicitors, ‘said of the cost of wills including a complex trust, “but it’s just words”! It is our job to explain how that piece of paper benefits that client and their family’.

More than 200 lawyers at small and independent firms across England and Wales were surveyed for the research, ‘The Changing Face of Law’, along with 12 in-depth interviews, published by LexisNexis this week. 

Jon Whittle, market development director at LexisNexis UK, said: ‘The internet has encouraged consumers of almost all products and services to be able to make quick and easy comparisons between providers and price is the easiest common denominator.

‘Most solicitors we surveyed believe that outcomes are the most important factor for clients when it comes to judging value for money. Service, speed, and efficiency follow, with price falling last.’

Issue: 7827 / Categories: Legal News , Legal services , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Projects and rail practices strengthened by director hire in London

DWF—Stephen Hickling

DWF—Stephen Hickling

Real estate team in Birmingham welcomes back returning partner

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Firm invests in national growth with 44 appointments across five offices

NEWS
The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 transformed criminal justice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ed Cape of UWE and Matthew Hardcastle and Sandra Paul of Kingsley Napley trace its ‘seismic impact’
Operational resilience is no longer optional. Writing in NLJ this week, Emma Radmore and Michael Lewis of Womble Bond Dickinson explain how UK regulators expect firms to identify ‘important business services’ that could cause ‘intolerable levels of harm’ if disrupted
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
back-to-top-scroll