header-logo header-logo

Bellwether reveals complacent firms

09 October 2018
Issue: 7812 / Categories: Legal News , Legal services , Profession
printer mail-detail

More than half of independent law firms contributing to this year’s second Bellwether report were unaware of, let alone prepared for, imminent regulatory reforms to allow freelance solicitors.

Among the four out of ten firms that said they were aware of the changes, many were not sure what measures to put in place to safeguard their firm.

The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) ‘Looking to the Future’ reforms, due to take effect later this year and next year, include allowing solicitors to provide non-reserved legal services directly to clients outside of the framework of a regulated law firms. In-house solicitors would be allowed to give legal advice to their employer’s clients, the rulebook would be shortened and separate codes of conduct provided for individuals and firms.

Some 70% of lawyers at independent firms agreed the reforms could compromise the ability of regulated firms to compete effectively with solicitors working outside regulated law firms, and the same number thought the reforms could lower standards in the market, while 65% believed competition would increase.

Sophie Barrett-Brown, senior partner at Laura Devine Solicitors, says in the report: ‘Firms are challenged to do everything faster, cheaper—there are certain ways that you can do that, for example, with AI [artificial intelligence] or technology to streamline work—but there’s only so much that can achieve and for many types of work a certain amount of time is still needed for good, old-fashioned thinking and doing it properly.’

The research also highlighted a general lack of satisfaction with both the SRA and the Law Society. Some 58% of respondents do not believe the SRA has adequately represented small and independent law firms in its formulation of policy and regulation. Half the solicitors surveyed believe the Law Society represents their interests badly.

Viv Williams, consulting director at Symphony Legal Consulting, says in the report: ‘The SRA feels that it needs to pursue certain things regardless of what the Law Society says because there’s something of a struggle for survival between the two.’

The ‘Bellwether Report 2018: Discussion Paper - A dangerous allegiance to the status quo?’ is based on discussions with more than 200 legal professionals and a round table event, and is written by Jon Whittle, LexisNexis market development director.

Issue: 7812 / Categories: Legal News , Legal services , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll